Does this fix the issue I was seeing since the new memory manager went into thr 4.9-wip branch?
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016, 10:48 am Christian König, <deathsim...@vodafone.de> wrote: > From: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com> > > We need to access those with the system domain. > > Fixes fallout from only allocating GTT space on demand. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c > index a6a48ed..8928a2a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c > @@ -552,6 +552,10 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_clear_bo(struct amdgpu_device > *adev, > if (r) > goto error; > > + r = amdgpu_ttm_bind(&bo->tbo, &bo->tbo.mem); > + if (r) > + goto error; > + > addr = amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(bo); > entries = amdgpu_bo_size(bo) / 8; > > @@ -625,6 +629,11 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_update_pd_or_shadow(struct > amdgpu_device *adev, > > if (!pd) > return 0; > + > + r = amdgpu_ttm_bind(&pd->tbo, &pd->tbo.mem); > + if (r) > + return r; > + > pd_addr = amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(pd); > ring = container_of(vm->entity.sched, struct amdgpu_ring, sched); > > @@ -650,6 +659,14 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_update_pd_or_shadow(struct > amdgpu_device *adev, > if (bo == NULL) > continue; > > + if (bo->shadow) { > + struct amdgpu_bo *shadow = bo->shadow; > + > + r = amdgpu_ttm_bind(&shadow->tbo, > &shadow->tbo.mem); > + if (r) > + return r; > + } > + > pt = amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(bo); > if (!shadow) { > if (vm->page_tables[pt_idx].addr == pt) > -- > 2.5.0 > > _______________________________________________ > amd-gfx mailing list > amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx >
_______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx