Am 27.03.2017 um 02:58 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com>
We were accidentally only overriding the first VRAM placement. For BOs
with the RADEON_GEM_NO_CPU_ACCESS flag set,
radeon_ttm_placement_from_domain creates a second VRAM placment with
fpfn == 0. If VRAM is almost full, the first VRAM placement with
fpfn > 0 may not work, but the second one with fpfn == 0 always will
(the BO's current location trivially satisfies it). Because "moving"
the BO to its current location puts it back on the LRU list, this
results in an infinite loop.
Fixes: 2a85aedd117c ("drm/radeon: Try evicting from CPU accessible to
inaccessible VRAM first")
Reported-by: Zachary Michaels <zmicha...@oblong.com>
Reported-and-Tested-by: Julien Isorce <jiso...@oblong.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
index 5c7cf644ba1d..37d68cd1f272 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
@@ -213,8 +213,8 @@ static void radeon_evict_flags(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
rbo->placement.num_busy_placement = 0;
for (i = 0; i < rbo->placement.num_placement; i++) {
if (rbo->placements[i].flags &
TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM) {
- if (rbo->placements[0].fpfn < fpfn)
- rbo->placements[0].fpfn = fpfn;
+ if (rbo->placements[i].fpfn < fpfn)
+ rbo->placements[i].fpfn = fpfn;
} else {
rbo->placement.busy_placement =
&rbo->placements[i];
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
