Hey Tom,

If it's the same as your old firmware you might be missing an extra step. I
usually just run the kernel 'make install' as that usually take care of the
distro specific quirks.

Regards,
Andres

On Apr 5, 2017 9:56 AM, "Deucher, Alexander" <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: StDenis, Tom
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2017 9:14 AM
> > To: Alex Deucher
> > Cc: Andres Rodriguez; Deucher, Alexander; Tom St Denis; amd-
> > g...@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [RFC] Revert "drm/amdgpu/gfx8: Fix SET_RESOURCES packet"
> >
> > On 05/04/17 09:06 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Tom St Denis <tom.stde...@amd.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> My firmware is
> > >>
> > >>         fw.VCE == .feature==0 .firmware==0x34040300
> > >>         fw.UVD == .feature==0 .firmware==0x015b0b00
> > >>         fw.MC == .feature==0 .firmware==0x00000000
> > >>         fw.ME == .feature==46 .firmware==0x000000a1
> > >>         fw.PFP == .feature==46 .firmware==0x000000eb
> > >>         fw.CE == .feature==46 .firmware==0x00000086
> > >>         fw.RLC == .feature==1 .firmware==0x0000009c
> > >>         fw.MEC == .feature==46 .firmware==0x000002c1
> > >>         fw.MEC2 == .feature==46 .firmware==0x000002c1
> > >>         fw.SOS == .feature==0 .firmware==0x00000000
> > >>         fw.ASD == .feature==0 .firmware==0x00000000
> > >>         fw.SMC == .feature==0 .firmware==0x00000000
> > >>         fw.SDMA0 == .feature==0 .firmware==0x00000022
> > >>         fw.SDMA1 == .feature==0 .firmware==0x00000022
> > >>
> > >> It seems like our all-open is behind what he has for SDMA, SMC, RLC
> but
> > >> ahead for others?  Bizarre.
> > >
> > > Can you try the upstream ucode?  That is what Andres is using.
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-
> > firmware.git
> >
> > Copying the tip of master from that to my /lib/firmware/ results in the
> > same firmware versions being loaded.
> >
>
> Same as you or same as Andres?
>
> Alex
>
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Tom
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 04/04/17 04:17 PM, Andres Rodriguez wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> This should be the the linux-firmware repository @ commit
> > >>> 6d3bc8886517d171068fd1263176b8b5c51df204
> > >>>
> > >>> I reverted back to that firmware since I didn't want to deal with
> > >>> possible bugs when testing my patches.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> Andres
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Deucher, Alexander
> > >>> <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>> From: Andres Rodriguez [mailto:andre...@gmail.com]
> > >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 4:01 PM
> > >>>>> To: Tom St Denis; Deucher, Alexander; StDenis, Tom; amd-
> > >>>>> g...@lists.freedesktop.org
> > >>>>> Subject: Re: [RFC] Revert "drm/amdgpu/gfx8: Fix SET_RESOURCES
> > packet"
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This is my info in case that is useful:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>      umr.version == ea8e49bb15ed
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>      fw.VCE == .feature==0 .firmware==0x34040300
> > >>>>>      fw.UVD == .feature==0 .firmware==0x014f1000
> > >>>>>      fw.MC == .feature==0 .firmware==0x00000000
> > >>>>>      fw.ME == .feature==37 .firmware==0x00000094
> > >>>>>      fw.PFP == .feature==37 .firmware==0x000000dc
> > >>>>>      fw.CE == .feature==37 .firmware==0x00000080
> > >>>>>      fw.RLC == .feature==1 .firmware==0x0000010e
> > >>>>>      fw.MEC == .feature==37 .firmware==0x000002a2
> > >>>>>      fw.MEC2 == .feature==37 .firmware==0x000002a2
> > >>>>>      fw.SOS == .feature==0 .firmware==0x00000000
> > >>>>>      fw.ASD == .feature==0 .firmware==0x00000000
> > >>>>>      fw.SMC == .feature==0 .firmware==0x00170f00
> > >>>>>      fw.SDMA0 == .feature==31 .firmware==0x00000036
> > >>>>>      fw.SDMA1 == .feature==0 .firmware==0x00000036
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>      asic.instance == 0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>      gfx.max_shader_engines == 4
> > >>>>>      gfx.max_tile_pipes == 8
> > >>>>>      gfx.max_cu_per_sh == 9
> > >>>>>      gfx.max_sh_per_se == 1
> > >>>>>      gfx.max_backends_per_se == 2
> > >>>>>      gfx.max_texture_channel_caches == 8
> > >>>>>      gfx.max_gprs == 256
> > >>>>>      gfx.max_gs_threads == 32
> > >>>>>      gfx.max_hw_contexts == 8
> > >>>>>      gfx.sc_prim_fifo_size_frontend == 32
> > >>>>>      gfx.sc_prim_fifo_size_backend == 256
> > >>>>>      gfx.sc_hiz_tile_fifo_size == 48
> > >>>>>      gfx.sc_earlyz_tile_fifo_size == 304
> > >>>>>      gfx.num_tile_pipes == 8
> > >>>>>      gfx.backend_enable_mask == 255
> > >>>>>      gfx.mem_max_burst_length_bytes == 256
> > >>>>>      gfx.mem_row_size_in_kb == 4
> > >>>>>      gfx.shader_engine_tile_size == 32
> > >>>>>      gfx.num_gpus == 1
> > >>>>>      gfx.multi_gpu_tile_size == 64
> > >>>>>      gfx.mc_arb_ramcfg == 24738
> > >>>>>      gfx.gb_addr_config == 570494979
> > >>>>>      gfx.num_rbs == 8
> > >>>>>      gfx.family = 130, Volcanic Islands
> > >>>>>      gfx.rev_id == 00000001
> > >>>>>      gfx.external_rev_id == 00000051
> > >>>>>      gfx.cg_flags == 003fffcd
> > >>>>>          AMD_CG_SUPPORT_GFX_MGCG
> > >>>>>          AMD_CG_SUPPORT_GFX_CGCG
> > >>>>>          AMD_CG_SUPPORT_GFX_CGLS
> > >>>>>          AMD_CG_SUPPORT_GFX_CP_LS
> > >>>>>          AMD_CG_SUPPORT_GFX_RLC_LS
> > >>>>>          AMD_CG_SUPPORT_MC_LS
> > >>>>>          AMD_CG_SUPPORT_MC_MGCG
> > >>>>>          AMD_CG_SUPPORT_SDMA_LS
> > >>>>>          AMD_CG_SUPPORT_SDMA_MGCG
> > >>>>>          AMD_CG_SUPPORT_BIF_LS
> > >>>>>          AMD_CG_SUPPORT_UVD_MGCG
> > >>>>>          AMD_CG_SUPPORT_VCE_MGCG
> > >>>>>          AMD_CG_SUPPORT_HDP_LS
> > >>>>>          AMD_CG_SUPPORT_HDP_MGCG
> > >>>>>          AMD_CG_SUPPORT_ROM_MGCG
> > >>>>>      gfx.pg_flags == 00000000
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Is this the stock firmware from upstream or the stuff I pointed you
> to
> > >>>> yesterday on my fdo site?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Alex
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>> Andres
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 2017-04-04 03:59 PM, Tom St Denis wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I'm using the latest from all open (our internal FC24 repo).  I'll
> > >>>>>> fetch
> > >>>>>> the exact later with "umr -c".
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Tom
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:48 PM Deucher, Alexander
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>>>>> From: amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org]
> > On
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Behalf
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Of Andres Rodriguez
> > >>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 3:39 PM
> > >>>>>>>> To: StDenis, Tom; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [RFC] Revert "drm/amdgpu/gfx8: Fix SET_RESOURCES
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> packet"
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 2017-04-04 08:27 AM, Tom St Denis wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On 03/04/17 04:25 PM, Andres Rodriguez wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Commit e579f56 results in a KCQ initialization error for
> polaris10
> > >>>>>>>>>> cards. Providing the full SET_RESOURCES packet instead of the
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> truncated
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> version fixes the problem.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I think this patch may have been one of the stabs at fixing
> the
> > KCQ
> > >>>>>>>>>> suspend/resume errors. I *think* it may no longer be needed
> > if that
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> is
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> the case.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Sending this mostly as an FYI to get the patch removed from
> > the
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 4.12-wip
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> This reverts commit
> > e579f564c333a7eaddf7e12b1b8414410c36e80f.
> > >>>>>>>>>> ---
> > >>>>>>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 6 +++++-
> > >>>>>>>>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
> > >>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
> > >>>>>>>>>> index 2d8d7bb..4c3bf51 100644
> > >>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
> > >>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
> > >>>>>>>>>> @@ -4647,10 +4647,14 @@ static int
> > gfx_v8_0_kiq_kcq_enable(struct
> > >>>>>>>>>> amdgpu_device *adev)
> > >>>>>>>>>>           return r;
> > >>>>>>>>>>       }
> > >>>>>>>>>>       /* set resources */
> > >>>>>>>>>> -    amdgpu_ring_write(kiq_ring,
> > PACKET3(PACKET3_SET_RESOURCES,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 2));
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> +    amdgpu_ring_write(kiq_ring,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> PACKET3(PACKET3_SET_RESOURCES,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 6));
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>       amdgpu_ring_write(kiq_ring, 0);    /* vmid_mask:0
> > >>>>>>>>>> queue_type:0
> > >>>>>>>>>> (KIQ) */
> > >>>>>>>>>>       amdgpu_ring_write(kiq_ring, 0x000000FF);    /* queue
> mask
> > lo
> > >>>>>>>>>> */
> > >>>>>>>>>>       amdgpu_ring_write(kiq_ring, 0);    /* queue mask hi */
> > >>>>>>>>>> +    amdgpu_ring_write(kiq_ring, 0);    /* gws mask lo */
> > >>>>>>>>>> +    amdgpu_ring_write(kiq_ring, 0);    /* gws mask hi */
> > >>>>>>>>>> +    amdgpu_ring_write(kiq_ring, 0);    /* oac mask */
> > >>>>>>>>>> +    amdgpu_ring_write(kiq_ring, 0);    /* gds heap base:0,
> gds
> > >>>>>>>>>> heap
> > >>>>>>>>>> size:0 */
> > >>>>>>>>>>       for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_compute_rings; i++) {
> > >>>>>>>>>>           struct amdgpu_ring *ring =
> &adev->gfx.compute_ring[i];
> > >>>>>>>>>>           uint64_t mqd_addr = amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(ring-
> > >mqd_obj);
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> This fixes init issues with my polaris board but there's still
> a
> > >>>>>>>>> clock
> > >>>>>>>>> problem (CP is pegged at 100% as read by umr) resulting in the
> > GPU
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> clock
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> staying at 1200MHz the entire time.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Yeah I sent this out because I was having KCQ init issues on my
> > >>>>>>>> polaris10 card. However, I'm not seeing the CP pegged at 100% as
> > you
> > >>>>>>>> mentioned. Everything sitting quietly at 0% here.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Which firmware are you using?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Alex
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Tom
> > >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>>>>>> amd-gfx mailing list
> > >>>>>>>>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > >>>>>>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>>>>> amd-gfx mailing list
> > >>>>>>>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > >>>>>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>>>> amd-gfx mailing list
> > >>>>>>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > >>>>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> amd-gfx mailing list
> > >> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
>
>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to