On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Nicolai Hähnle <nhaeh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20.06.2017 12:34, Marek Olšák wrote: >> >> BTW, I noticed the flush sequence in the kernel is wrong. The correct >> flush sequence should be: >> >> 1) EVENT_WRITE_EOP - CACHE_FLUSH_AND_INV_TS - write a dword to memory, >> but no fence/interrupt. >> 2) WAIT_REG_MEM on the dword to wait for idle before SURFACE_SYNC. >> 3) SURFACE_SYNC (TC, K$, I$) >> 4) Write CP_COHER_CNTL2. >> 5) EVENT_WRITE_EOP - BOTTOM_OF_PIPE_TS - write the fence with the >> interrupt. >> >> WAIT_REG_MEM wouldn't be needed if we were able to merge >> CACHE_FLUSH_AND_INV, SURFACE_SYNC, and CP_COHER_CNTL2 into one EOP >> event. >> >> The main issue with the current flush sequence in radeon and amdgpu is >> that it doesn't wait for idle before writing CP_COHER_CNTL2 and >> SURFACE_SYNC. So far we've been able to avoid the bug by waiting for >> idle in userspace IBs. > > > This is gfx9-only though, right?
No, I'm only talking about SI. Marek _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
