This is partly to silence a static checker warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ci_dpm.c:4553 ci_set_mc_special_registers()
error: buffer overflow 'table->mc_reg_address' 16 <= 16
The story is that it's valid to exit the loop with "j" less than or equal
to SMU7_DISCRETE_MC_REGISTER_ARRAY_SIZE". That value for "j" gets saved
as table->last. We're not allow to access "table->mc_reg_address[j]"
when j == SMU7_DISCRETE_MC_REGISTER_ARRAY_SIZE because that's one past
the end of the array.
The tests for "if (j > SMU7_DISCRETE_MC_REGISTER_ARRAY_SIZE)" in
ci_set_mc_special_registers() are always false because we start with
j less than the array size and we increment it once so at most it can be
equal.
Then there is a bogus check in ci_register_patching_mc_seq() where
it complains if "table->last >= SMU7_DISCRETE_MC_REGISTER_ARRAY_SIZE".
The "table->last" value can't possibly be greater than the array size
and it is allowed to be equal to it. So let's just remove that test
entirely.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
---
Not tested. Please review this one carefully.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ci_dpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ci_dpm.c
index c97fbb2ab48b..d3136e020d5a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ci_dpm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ci_dpm.c
@@ -4342,10 +4342,10 @@ static int ci_set_mc_special_registers(struct
radeon_device *rdev,
table->mc_reg_table_entry[k].mc_data[j]
|= 0x100;
}
j++;
- if (j > SMU7_DISCRETE_MC_REGISTER_ARRAY_SIZE)
- return -EINVAL;
if (!pi->mem_gddr5) {
+ if (j >= SMU7_DISCRETE_MC_REGISTER_ARRAY_SIZE)
+ return -EINVAL;
table->mc_reg_address[j].s1 = MC_PMG_AUTO_CMD
>> 2;
table->mc_reg_address[j].s0 = MC_PMG_AUTO_CMD
>> 2;
for (k = 0; k < table->num_entries; k++) {
@@ -4521,8 +4521,6 @@ static int ci_register_patching_mc_seq(struct
radeon_device *rdev,
((rdev->pdev->device == 0x67B0) ||
(rdev->pdev->device == 0x67B1))) {
for (i = 0; i < table->last; i++) {
- if (table->last >= SMU7_DISCRETE_MC_REGISTER_ARRAY_SIZE)
- return -EINVAL;
switch(table->mc_reg_address[i].s1 >> 2) {
case MC_SEQ_MISC1:
for (k = 0; k < table->num_entries; k++) {
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
