> > On Oct 9, 2025, at 11:51 AM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 11:23:01AM +0200, Matthew Schwartz wrote: >> This fix regressed the original issue that commit d83c747a1225 >> ("drm/amd/display: Fix brightness level not retained over reboot") solved, >> so revert it until a different approach to solve the regression that >> it caused with AMD_PRIVATE_COLOR is found. >> >> Fixes: a490c8d77d50 ("drm/amd/display: Only restore backlight after >> amdgpu_dm_init or dm_resume") >> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/4620 >> Signed-off-by: Matthew Schwartz <[email protected]> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 12 ++++-------- >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.h | 7 ------- >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > <formletter> > > This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the > stable kernel tree. Please read: > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html > for how to do this properly.
Apologies, I was a bit confused by: If a regression made it into a proper mainline release during the past twelve months, ensure to tag the fix with “Cc: [email protected]” in the regressions page, but I see now the way I did it via email cc was incorrect. Should I resend with that fixed? > > </formletter>
