There is no reason to clear the SMC table.
We also don't need to recalculate the power limit then.

Fixes: 841686df9f7d ("drm/amdgpu: add SI DPM support (v4)")
Signed-off-by: Timur Kristóf <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_dpm.c | 10 ----------
 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_dpm.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_dpm.c
index f7c2b1d206b6..87bab6c8564d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_dpm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_dpm.c
@@ -2273,8 +2273,6 @@ static int si_populate_smc_tdp_limits(struct 
amdgpu_device *adev,
                if (scaling_factor == 0)
                        return -EINVAL;
 
-               memset(smc_table, 0, sizeof(SISLANDS_SMC_STATETABLE));
-
                ret = si_calculate_adjusted_tdp_limits(adev,
                                                       false, /* ??? */
                                                       
adev->pm.dpm.tdp_adjustment,
@@ -2328,16 +2326,8 @@ static int si_populate_smc_tdp_limits_2(struct 
amdgpu_device *adev,
 
        if (ni_pi->enable_power_containment) {
                SISLANDS_SMC_STATETABLE *smc_table = &si_pi->smc_statetable;
-               u32 scaling_factor = si_get_smc_power_scaling_factor(adev);
                int ret;
 
-               memset(smc_table, 0, sizeof(SISLANDS_SMC_STATETABLE));
-
-               smc_table->dpm2Params.NearTDPLimit =
-                       
cpu_to_be32(si_scale_power_for_smc(adev->pm.dpm.near_tdp_limit_adjusted, 
scaling_factor) * 1000);
-               smc_table->dpm2Params.SafePowerLimit =
-                       
cpu_to_be32(si_scale_power_for_smc((adev->pm.dpm.near_tdp_limit_adjusted * 
SISLANDS_DPM2_TDP_SAFE_LIMIT_PERCENT) / 100, scaling_factor) * 1000);
-
                ret = amdgpu_si_copy_bytes_to_smc(adev,
                                                  (si_pi->state_table_start +
                                                   
offsetof(SISLANDS_SMC_STATETABLE, dpm2Params) +
-- 
2.52.0

Reply via email to