On 1/20/26 21:44, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 04:07:06PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> From: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
>>
>> dma-buf invalidation is performed asynchronously by hardware, so VFIO must
>> wait until all affected objects have been fully invalidated.
>>
>> Fixes: 5d74781ebc86 ("vfio/pci: Add dma-buf export support for MMIO regions")
>> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c 
>> b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c
>> index d4d0f7d08c53..33bc6a1909dd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c
>> @@ -321,6 +321,9 @@ void vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(struct vfio_pci_core_device 
>> *vdev, bool revoked)
>>                      dma_resv_lock(priv->dmabuf->resv, NULL);
>>                      priv->revoked = revoked;
>>                      dma_buf_move_notify(priv->dmabuf);
>> +                    dma_resv_wait_timeout(priv->dmabuf->resv,
>> +                                          DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL, false,
>> +                                          MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> 
> Should we explicitly call out in the dma_buf_move_notify() /
> invalidate_mappings kernel-doc that KERNEL slots are the mechanism
> for communicating asynchronous dma_buf_move_notify /
> invalidate_mappings events via fences?

Oh, I missed that! And no that is not correct.

This should be DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP so that we wait for everything.

Regards,
Christian.

> 
> Yes, this is probably implied, but it wouldn’t hurt to state this
> explicitly as part of the cross-driver contract.
> 
> Here is what we have now:
> 
>        * - Dynamic importers should set fences for any access that they can't
>        *   disable immediately from their 
> &dma_buf_attach_ops.invalidate_mappings
>        *   callback.
> 
> Matt
> 
>>                      dma_resv_unlock(priv->dmabuf->resv);
>>              }
>>              fput(priv->dmabuf->file);
>> @@ -342,6 +345,8 @@ void vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup(struct 
>> vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
>>              priv->vdev = NULL;
>>              priv->revoked = true;
>>              dma_buf_move_notify(priv->dmabuf);
>> +            dma_resv_wait_timeout(priv->dmabuf->resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL,
>> +                                  false, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
>>              dma_resv_unlock(priv->dmabuf->resv);
>>              vfio_device_put_registration(&vdev->vdev);
>>              fput(priv->dmabuf->file);
>>
>> -- 
>> 2.52.0
>>

Reply via email to