On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com> wrote: > Am 12.10.2017 um 18:20 schrieb Michel Dänzer: >> >> On 12/10/17 05:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: >>> >>> Hi Dave, >>> >>> One memory management regression fix. >>> >>> The following changes since commit >>> 545036a9944e9d6e50fed4ca03117147c880ff71: >>> >>> Merge tag 'drm-misc-fixes-2017-10-11' of >>> git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc into drm-fixes (2017-10-12 >>> 10:38:09 +1000) >>> >>> are available in the git repository at: >>> >>> git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux drm-fixes-4.14 >>> >>> for you to fetch changes up to 27b94b4f1386c3a8181f5a0277434a32e24e7dd7: >>> >>> drm/amdgpu: fix placement flags in amdgpu_ttm_bind (2017-10-12 >>> 10:34:42 -0400) >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Christian König (1): >>> drm/amdgpu: fix placement flags in amdgpu_ttm_bind >> >> Thanks Alex, but there's another piglit hang regression in 4.14, caused >> by commit 6af0883ed977 "drm/amdgpu: discard commands of killed >> processes", fixed by five commits 6b37d03280a4..318d85de9c20 in >> amd-staging-drm-next. Either the latter need to be backported to 4.14, >> or the former needs to be reverted from it. > > > The revert is probably easier to handle at this point. > > So to answer your question from the other thread I vote for that.
Nicolai's patches apply cleanly and I think they change about the same amount of code and we don't have to worry about any problems down the road when the revert gets merged into drm-next. Alex _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
