The resume clearance test skipped every other allocation, expecting an
interleaved clear/dirty layout. But the buddy allocator hands out blocks
contiguously, so this just allocated half the pages in one chunk and never
exercised gpu_buddy_reset_clear()'s force-merge of opposite-state buddies.
Allocate all pages into two lists instead and free one cleared, one dirty,
to build a truly interleaved pattern.

v2: Use for loops instead of do-while for the allocation loops (Jani Nikula)

Fixes: e3335ccbf4da ("drm/tests/gpu_buddy: add a new test case for buffer 
clearance during resume")
Reported-by: Sashiko-bot <[email protected]>
Closes: 
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=1
Cc: Matthew Auld <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian König <[email protected]>
Assisted-by: GitHub_Copilot:claude-opus-4.8
Signed-off-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c 
b/drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c
index 89698563c61b..e258bf1fa0fb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c
@@ -1004,42 +1004,51 @@ static void gpu_test_buddy_alloc_clear(struct kunit 
*test)
        gpu_buddy_fini(&mm);
 
        /*
-        * Using a non-power-of-two mm size, allocate alternating blocks of 
4KiB in an
-        * even sequence and free them as cleared. All blocks should be marked 
as
-        * dirty and the split blocks should be merged back to their original
-        * size when the blocks clear reset function is called.
+        * Using a non-power-of-two mm size, allocate all 4KiB blocks and split
+        * them across two alternating lists, then free one list as cleared and
+        * the other as dirty. This interleaves cleared and dirty blocks so that
+        * neighbouring buddies cannot be merged, fragmenting the address space.
+        * After gpu_buddy_reset_clear(false) every block should be marked dirty
+        * and the split blocks should be merged back to their original size, so
+        * clear_avail must drop to 0.
         */
        KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, gpu_buddy_init(&mm, mm_size, ps));
        KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mm.max_order, max_order);
 
-       i = 0;
        n_pages = mm_size / ps;
-       do {
-               if (i % 2 == 0)
-                       KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, 
gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
-                                                                           ps, 
ps, &allocated, 0),
-                                       "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%lu\n", 
ps);
-       } while (++i < n_pages);
+       for (i = 0; i < n_pages; i++) {
+               struct list_head *list = (i % 2) ? &clean : &dirty;
 
-       gpu_buddy_free_list(&mm, &allocated, GPU_BUDDY_CLEARED);
+               KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,
+                                                                   ps, ps, 
list, 0),
+                               "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%lu\n", ps);
+       }
+
+       gpu_buddy_free_list(&mm, &clean, GPU_BUDDY_CLEARED);
+       gpu_buddy_free_list(&mm, &dirty, 0);
        gpu_buddy_reset_clear(&mm, false);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mm.clear_avail, 0);
+       gpu_buddy_fini(&mm);
 
        /*
-        * Using a non-power-of-two mm size, allocate alternating blocks of 
4KiB in an
-        * odd sequence and free them as cleared. All blocks should be marked as
-        * cleared and the split blocks should be merged back to their original
-        * size when the blocks clear reset function is called.
+        * Repeat the same fragmented setup, but this time call
+        * gpu_buddy_reset_clear(true). Every block should be marked cleared and
+        * the split blocks should be merged back to their original size, so the
+        * whole address space (clear_avail) must equal mm_size.
         */
-       i = 0;
-       do {
-               if (i % 2 != 0)
-                       KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, 
gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
-                                                                           ps, 
ps, &allocated, 0),
-                                       "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%lu\n", 
ps);
-       } while (++i < n_pages);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, gpu_buddy_init(&mm, mm_size, ps));
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mm.max_order, max_order);
 
-       gpu_buddy_free_list(&mm, &allocated, GPU_BUDDY_CLEARED);
+       for (i = 0; i < n_pages; i++) {
+               struct list_head *list = (i % 2) ? &clean : &dirty;
+
+               KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,
+                                                                   ps, ps, 
list, 0),
+                               "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%lu\n", ps);
+       }
+
+       gpu_buddy_free_list(&mm, &clean, GPU_BUDDY_CLEARED);
+       gpu_buddy_free_list(&mm, &dirty, 0);
        gpu_buddy_reset_clear(&mm, true);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mm.clear_avail, mm_size);
        gpu_buddy_fini(&mm);

base-commit: bc47d5937f21c5fc94504f03e18f1adb56d97634
-- 
2.34.1

Reply via email to