Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/amdgpu: drop client_id from VM

Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:40:40 -0800 

The patch itself is Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.z...@amd.com>

Another question,
vice versa, Could PASID directly use fence context if we switch to use fence context as client id? any bits limited in hw to present PASID? 


Regards,
David Zhou

On 2017年12月21日 16:15, Christian König wrote:
The problem is PASID would never work correctly, it is only 16bits and so gets reused quite often.
But we introduced the client_id because we needed an unique 64bit identifier which never repeats. 

Felix probably didn't knew that when he added the comment.

Regards,
Christian.

Am 21.12.2017 um 04:05 schrieb Chunming Zhou:
I agree using fence_context is same efficiency with original client id, since vm only has one sdma entity.
But PASID seems be more proper with per-VM-per-process concept, the comment also said that. 

Regards,
David Zhou
On 2017年12月20日 21:21, Christian König wrote:

Use the fence context from the scheduler entity.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ids.c | 8 ++++----
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c  | 2 --
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h  | 4 ----
  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ids.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ids.c 
index d24884b419cb..16884a0b677b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ids.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ids.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static int amdgpu_vmid_grab_reserved_locked(struct amdgpu_vm *vm, 
        flushed  = id->flushed_updates;
      if ((amdgpu_vmid_had_gpu_reset(adev, id)) ||
-        (atomic64_read(&id->owner) != vm->client_id) ||
+        (atomic64_read(&id->owner) != vm->entity.fence_context) ||
          (job->vm_pd_addr != id->pd_gpu_addr) ||
          (updates && (!flushed || updates->context != flushed->context || 
              dma_fence_is_later(updates, flushed))) ||
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int amdgpu_vmid_grab_reserved_locked(struct amdgpu_vm *vm, 
          id->flushed_updates = dma_fence_get(updates);
      }
      id->pd_gpu_addr = job->vm_pd_addr;
-    atomic64_set(&id->owner, vm->client_id);
+    atomic64_set(&id->owner, vm->entity.fence_context);
      job->vm_needs_flush = needs_flush;
      if (needs_flush) {
          dma_fence_put(id->last_flush);
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ int amdgpu_vmid_grab(struct amdgpu_vm *vm, struct amdgpu_ring *ring, 
          if (amdgpu_vmid_had_gpu_reset(adev, id))
              continue;
  -        if (atomic64_read(&id->owner) != vm->client_id)
+        if (atomic64_read(&id->owner) != vm->entity.fence_context)
              continue;
            if (job->vm_pd_addr != id->pd_gpu_addr)
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ int amdgpu_vmid_grab(struct amdgpu_vm *vm, struct amdgpu_ring *ring, 
      id->pd_gpu_addr = job->vm_pd_addr;
      dma_fence_put(id->flushed_updates);
      id->flushed_updates = dma_fence_get(updates);
-    atomic64_set(&id->owner, vm->client_id);
+    atomic64_set(&id->owner, vm->entity.fence_context);
    needs_flush:
      job->vm_needs_flush = true;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c 
index 946bc21c6d7d..af7dceb7131e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
@@ -2256,7 +2256,6 @@ int amdgpu_vm_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm, 
      uint64_t init_pde_value = 0;
        vm->va = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
-    vm->client_id = atomic64_inc_return(&adev->vm_manager.client_counter); 
      for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_MAX_VMHUBS; i++)
          vm->reserved_vmid[i] = NULL;
      spin_lock_init(&vm->status_lock);
@@ -2502,7 +2501,6 @@ void amdgpu_vm_manager_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev) 
          adev->vm_manager.seqno[i] = 0;
        atomic_set(&adev->vm_manager.vm_pte_next_ring, 0);
-    atomic64_set(&adev->vm_manager.client_counter, 0);
      spin_lock_init(&adev->vm_manager.prt_lock);
      atomic_set(&adev->vm_manager.num_prt_users, 0);
  diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h 
index 78296d1a5b2f..21a80f1bb2b9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h
@@ -191,8 +191,6 @@ struct amdgpu_vm {
      /* Scheduler entity for page table updates */
      struct drm_sched_entity    entity;
  -    /* client id and PASID (TODO: replace client_id with PASID) */
-    u64                     client_id;
      unsigned int        pasid;
      /* dedicated to vm */
      struct amdgpu_vmid    *reserved_vmid[AMDGPU_MAX_VMHUBS];
@@ -230,8 +228,6 @@ struct amdgpu_vm_manager {
      struct amdgpu_ring *vm_pte_rings[AMDGPU_MAX_RINGS];
      unsigned                vm_pte_num_rings;
      atomic_t                vm_pte_next_ring;
-    /* client id counter */
-    atomic64_t                client_counter;
        /* partial resident texture handling */
      spinlock_t                prt_lock;






_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to