Can you provide the example of which different block with the same type and why we want to do that ? With the old implementation , the bit mask is depends on the order that driver call the amdgpu_device_ip_block_add(), they are not fixed . With this change ,at least developer can count out how to set the bit mask after check the ip type defines and they are fixed for amdgpu driver .
Regards Shaoyun.liu -----Original Message----- From: Christian König [mailto:ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2018 3:17 PM To: Liu, Shaoyun; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Set the bit of ip_block_mask correspond to the IP block define NAK, there might be different blocks with the same type and we want to be able to disable/enable them individually. But we could improve a bit printing which block has which number during startup. Regards, Christian. Am 01.02.2018 um 21:10 schrieb Shaoyun Liu: > Change-Id: I4bdc6dbcd82f32416f65e0a38fb9c3cb580684bf > Signed-off-by: Shaoyun Liu <shaoyun....@amd.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c > index 21be5e5..05bf9b6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c > @@ -1297,7 +1297,8 @@ static int amdgpu_device_ip_early_init(struct > amdgpu_device *adev) > } > > for (i = 0; i < adev->num_ip_blocks; i++) { > - if ((amdgpu_ip_block_mask & (1 << i)) == 0) { > + if ((amdgpu_ip_block_mask & > + (1 << adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type)) == 0) { > DRM_ERROR("disabled ip block: %d <%s>\n", > i, adev->ip_blocks[i].version->funcs->name); > adev->ip_blocks[i].status.valid = false; _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
