I would rather avoid calling the function in the first place.
Christian. Am 26.02.2018 um 06:18 schrieb Monk Liu:
Change-Id: I370966acd0f1925a99dfde888678e6e0fd093b15 Signed-off-by: Monk Liu <monk....@amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c index 337db57..5fb4357 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c @@ -1117,11 +1117,13 @@ static void amdgpu_uvd_idle_work_handler(struct work_struct *work) { struct amdgpu_device *adev = container_of(work, struct amdgpu_device, uvd.idle_work.work); - unsigned fences = amdgpu_fence_count_emitted(&adev->uvd.ring); + unsigned fences;if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev))BUG();+ fences = amdgpu_fence_count_emitted(&adev->uvd.ring);+ if (fences == 0) { if (adev->pm.dpm_enabled) { amdgpu_dpm_enable_uvd(adev, false);
_______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
