On 08/07/2018 03:51 PM, zhoucm1 wrote:
On 2018年08月07日 15:26, Junwei Zhang wrote:When create bo from user memory, add it to handle table for future query. Signed-off-by: Junwei Zhang <jerry.zh...@amd.com> --- amdgpu/amdgpu_bo.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo.c b/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo.c index 422c7c9..b24e698 100644 --- a/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo.c +++ b/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo.c @@ -556,7 +556,16 @@ int amdgpu_create_bo_from_user_mem(amdgpu_device_handle dev, bo->alloc_size = size; bo->handle = args.handle; - *buf_handle = bo; + pthread_mutex_lock(&bo->dev->bo_table_mutex); + r = handle_table_insert(&bo->dev->bo_handles, bo->handle, bo); + pthread_mutex_unlock(&bo->dev->bo_table_mutex); + + pthread_mutex_init(&bo->cpu_access_mutex, NULL);This line is nothing with patch itself, please separate from it.
We may not add it for user mem bo, not sure if user would access that bo by cpu mapping. so add that at the same time. Do you mean add it in another patch? Jerry
Regards, David Zhou+ + if (r) + amdgpu_bo_free(bo); + else + *buf_handle = bo; return r; }_______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
