>-----Original Message-----
>From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
>Christian König
>Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 6:50 PM
>To: Deng, Emily <emily.d...@amd.com>; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu/sriov: For sriov runtime, use kiq to do
>invalidate tlb
>
>Am 15.08.2018 um 11:48 schrieb Emily Deng:
>> To avoid the tlb flush not interrupted by world switch, use kiq and
>> one command to do tlb invalidate.
>>
>> v2:
>> Add firmware version checking.
>>
>> v3:
>> Refine the code, and move the firmware checking into
>> gfx_v9_0_ring_emit_reg_write_reg_wait.
>>
>> SWDEV-161497
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Emily Deng <emily.d...@amd.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h      |  4 +++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c |  3 --
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c    | 15 +++++++-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c    | 61
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>> index 07924d4..67b584b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>> @@ -210,6 +210,10 @@ enum amdgpu_kiq_irq {
>>      AMDGPU_CP_KIQ_IRQ_LAST
>>   };
>>
>> +#define MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT       5000 /* in usecs, 5ms */
>> +#define MAX_KIQ_REG_BAILOUT_INTERVAL   5 /* in msecs, 5ms */
>> +#define MAX_KIQ_REG_TRY 20
>> +
>>   int amdgpu_device_ip_set_clockgating_state(void *dev,
>>                                         enum amd_ip_block_type block_type,
>>                                         enum amd_clockgating_state state);
>diff --git
>> a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
>> index 21adb1b6..3885636 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
>> @@ -22,9 +22,6 @@
>>    */
>>
>>   #include "amdgpu.h"
>> -#define MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT    5000 /* in usecs, 5ms */
>> -#define MAX_KIQ_REG_BAILOUT_INTERVAL        5 /* in msecs, 5ms */
>> -#define MAX_KIQ_REG_TRY 20
>>
>>   uint64_t amdgpu_csa_vaddr(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>   {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
>> index 76d979e..c9b3db4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
>> @@ -4348,8 +4348,21 @@ static void
>gfx_v9_0_ring_emit_reg_write_reg_wait(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>>                                                uint32_t ref, uint32_t mask)
>>   {
>>      int usepfp = (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX);
>> +    struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
>> +    bool fw_version_ok = false;
>>
>> -    if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(ring->adev))
>> +    if (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX) {
>> +            if ((adev->gfx.me_fw_version >= 0x0000009c) && (adev-
>>gfx.me_feature_version >= 42))
>> +                    if ((adev->gfx.pfp_fw_version >=  0x000000b1) &&
>> +(adev->gfx.pfp_feature_version >= 42))
>
>Why "if (...) if (...)" ? Just if (... && ...) should do as well.
Ok, will modify.
>
>> +                            fw_version_ok = true;
>> +    } else {
>> +            if ((adev->gfx.mec_fw_version >=  0x00000193) && (adev-
>>gfx.mec_feature_version >= 42))
>> +                    fw_version_ok = true;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    fw_version_ok = (adev->asic_type == CHIP_VEGA10) ? fw_version_ok :
>> +false;
>> +
>> +    if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev) && fw_version_ok)
>>              gfx_v9_0_wait_reg_mem(ring, usepfp, 0, 1, reg0, reg1,
>>                                    ref, mask, 0x20);
>>      else
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
>> index ed467de..3419178 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
>> @@ -311,6 +311,60 @@ static uint32_t
>gmc_v9_0_get_invalidate_req(unsigned int vmid)
>>      return req;
>>   }
>>
>> +signed long  amdgpu_kiq_invalidate_tlb(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct
>amdgpu_vmhub *hub,
>> +            unsigned eng, u32 req, uint32_t vmid)
>
>Better make that function just a generic reg_write_reg_wait function, instead 
>of
>specialized for tlb flushing.
Do you mean rename the function to amdgpu_reg_write_reg_wait?
>
>> +{
>> +    signed long r, cnt = 0;
>> +    unsigned long flags;
>> +    uint32_t seq;
>> +    struct amdgpu_kiq *kiq = &adev->gfx.kiq;
>> +    struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &kiq->ring;
>> +
>> +    if (!ring->ready) {
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    spin_lock_irqsave(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +    amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 32);
>> +    amdgpu_ring_emit_reg_write_reg_wait(ring, hub->vm_inv_eng0_req +
>eng,
>> +                                        hub->vm_inv_eng0_ack + eng,
>> +                                        req, 1 << vmid);
>> +    amdgpu_fence_emit_polling(ring, &seq);
>> +    amdgpu_ring_commit(ring);
>> +    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +    r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, seq, MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT);
>> +
>> +    /* don't wait anymore for gpu reset case because this way may
>> +     * block gpu_recover() routine forever, e.g. this virt_kiq_rreg
>> +     * is triggered in TTM and ttm_bo_lock_delayed_workqueue() will
>> +     * never return if we keep waiting in virt_kiq_rreg, which cause
>> +     * gpu_recover() hang there.
>> +     *
>> +     * also don't wait anymore for IRQ context
>> +     * */
>> +    if (r < 1 && (adev->in_gpu_reset || in_interrupt()))
>> +            goto failed_kiq;
>> +
>> +    if (in_interrupt())
>> +            might_sleep();
>
>What should that be good for?
It is only used for the interrupt case.
>> +
>> +    while (r < 1 && cnt++ < MAX_KIQ_REG_TRY) {
>> +            msleep(MAX_KIQ_REG_BAILOUT_INTERVAL);
>> +            r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, seq,
>MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (cnt > MAX_KIQ_REG_TRY)
>> +            goto failed_kiq;
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +
>> +failed_kiq:
>> +    pr_err("failed to invalidate tlb with kiq\n");
>> +    return r;
>> +}
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * GART
>>    * VMID 0 is the physical GPU addresses as used by the kernel.
>> @@ -332,6 +386,7 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct
>amdgpu_device *adev,
>>      /* Use register 17 for GART */
>>      const unsigned eng = 17;
>>      unsigned i, j;
>> +    int r;
>>
>>      spin_lock(&adev->gmc.invalidate_lock);
>>
>> @@ -339,6 +394,12 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct
>amdgpu_device *adev,
>>              struct amdgpu_vmhub *hub = &adev->vmhub[i];
>>              u32 tmp = gmc_v9_0_get_invalidate_req(vmid);
>>
>> +            if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev) ) {
>
>As discussed drop the sriov check here and use the KIQ path all the time.
Already drop it in the patch 2.

Best wishes
Emily Deng
>Christian.
>
>> +                    r = amdgpu_kiq_invalidate_tlb(adev, hub, eng, tmp,
>vmid);
>> +                    if (!r)
>> +                            continue;
>> +            }
>> +
>>              WREG32_NO_KIQ(hub->vm_inv_eng0_req + eng, tmp);
>>
>>              /* Busy wait for ACK.*/
>
>_______________________________________________
>amd-gfx mailing list
>amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to