Am 27.09.2018 um 12:00 schrieb Huang Rui:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 03:53:19PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
We ignored the return code here.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
index f35d7a554ad5..2420ae90047e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
@@ -959,6 +959,9 @@ static int gmc_v9_0_sw_init(void *handle)
/* This interrupt is VMC page fault.*/
r = amdgpu_irq_add_id(adev, SOC15_IH_CLIENTID_VMC,
VMC_1_0__SRCID__VM_FAULT,
&adev->gmc.vm_fault);
+ if (r)
+ return r;
+
r = amdgpu_irq_add_id(adev, SOC15_IH_CLIENTID_UTCL2,
UTCL2_1_0__SRCID__FAULT,
&adev->gmc.vm_fault);
We should tear down the client source that allocated by the
SOC15_IH_CLIENTID_VMC (the last one) if it (the second one) gets failed.
There is no such thing as a teardown. amdgpu_irq_add_id() registers the
irq callback for the clientid/srcid combination, but there isn't an
unregister function.
Christian.
Thanks,
Ray
--
2.14.1
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
