Only for testing, not sure if we should keep it like this.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c
index a362904d73f7..5fa80b231da3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c
@@ -2052,7 +2052,7 @@ static void sdma_v4_0_set_vm_pte_funcs(struct
amdgpu_device *adev)
adev->vm_manager.vm_pte_funcs = &sdma_v4_0_vm_pte_funcs;
for (i = 0; i < adev->sdma.num_instances; i++) {
- sched = &adev->sdma.instance[i].ring.sched;
+ sched = &adev->sdma.instance[i].page.sched;
adev->vm_manager.vm_pte_rqs[i] =
&sched->sched_rq[DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL];
}
--
2.14.1
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
