On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 4:20 AM Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote:
> On 2018-10-29 10:15 p.m., Marek Olšák wrote: > > You and I discussed this extensively internally a while ago. It's > expected > > and correct behavior. Mesa doesn't unmap some buffers and never will. > > It doesn't need to keep mapping the same buffer over and over again > though, does it? > It doesnt map it again. It just doesnt unmap. So the next map call just returns the pointer. It's correct to stop the counter wraparound. Marek > > -- > Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com > Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer >
_______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
