On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 3:40 AM Zhang, Jerry(Junwei) <jerry.zh...@amd.com> wrote: > > we can drop MC update patch, since a new fw could fix that.
Shouldn't we apply this as well for consistency? Alex > > Regards, > Jerry > > On 12/7/18 3:19 PM, Junwei Zhang wrote: > > Some new variants require different firmwares. > > > > Signed-off-by: Junwei Zhang <jerry.zh...@amd.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c | 5 ++++- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c > > index 1ad7e6b8ed1d..0edb8622f666 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c > > @@ -244,7 +244,10 @@ static int gmc_v8_0_init_microcode(struct > > amdgpu_device *adev) > > case CHIP_POLARIS10: > > if ((adev->pdev->device == 0x67df) && > > ((adev->pdev->revision == 0xe1) || > > - (adev->pdev->revision == 0xf7))) > > + (adev->pdev->revision == 0xf7)) || > > + ((adev->pdev->device == 0x6fdf) && > > + ((adev->pdev->revision == 0xef) || > > + (adev->pdev->revision == 0xff)))) > > chip_name = "polaris10_k"; > > else > > chip_name = "polaris10"; > > _______________________________________________ > amd-gfx mailing list > amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
