On 2019-04-02 10:29 a.m., Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Having DEFINE_SRCU() or DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() in a loadable module
> requires that the size of the reserved region be increased, which is
> not something we really want to be doing.  This commit therefore removes
> the DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c in
> favor of defining kfd_processes_srcu as a simple srcu_struct, initializing
> it in amdgpu_amdkfd_init(), and cleaning it up in amdgpu_amdkfd_fini().
>
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>
> Cc: Oded Gabbay <oded.gab...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koe...@amd.com
> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <david1.z...@amd.com>
> Cc: David Airlie <airl...@linux.ie>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
> Cc: <dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org>
> Cc: <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c | 5 +++++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c   | 2 +-
>   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c
> index fe1d7368c1e6..eadb20dee867 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
>   #include <linux/module.h>
>   #include <linux/dma-buf.h>
>   
> +extern struct srcu_struct kfd_processes_srcu;
> +
>   static const unsigned int compute_vmid_bitmap = 0xFF00;
>   
>   /* Total memory size in system memory and all GPU VRAM. Used to
> @@ -40,6 +42,8 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_init(void)
>       struct sysinfo si;
>       int ret;
>   
> +     ret = init_srcu_struct(&kfd_processes_srcu);
> +     WARN_ON(ret);

kfd_processes_srcu only exists if kfd_process.c is compiled in. That 
depends on CONFIG_HSA_AMD. So this should at least move into #ifdef a 
few lines below.

However, it would be cleaner to move this initialization into kfd_init 
in kfd_module.c, or better yet, into kfd_process_create_wq in 
kfd_process.c. Then kfd_process_create_wq should be renamed to something 
more generic, such as kfd_process_init.


>       si_meminfo(&si);
>       amdgpu_amdkfd_total_mem_size = si.totalram - si.totalhigh;
>       amdgpu_amdkfd_total_mem_size *= si.mem_unit;
> @@ -57,6 +61,7 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_init(void)
>   void amdgpu_amdkfd_fini(void)
>   {
>       kgd2kfd_exit();
> +     cleanup_srcu_struct(&kfd_processes_srcu);

Similarly, this would be cleaner in kfd_exit in kfd_module.c or 
kfd_process_destroy_wq in kfd_process.c, with that function similarly 
renamed to kfd_process_fini.

I'm attaching a revised patch. It's only compile tested.

Regards,
   Felix


>   }
>   
>   void amdgpu_amdkfd_device_probe(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> index 4bdae78bab8e..98b694068b8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ struct mm_struct;
>   DEFINE_HASHTABLE(kfd_processes_table, KFD_PROCESS_TABLE_SIZE);
>   static DEFINE_MUTEX(kfd_processes_mutex);
>   
> -DEFINE_SRCU(kfd_processes_srcu);
> +struct srcu_struct kfd_processes_srcu;
>   
>   /* For process termination handling */
>   static struct workqueue_struct *kfd_process_wq;
From 5857a9aa63957a5755ff81ae5c46533bca408c12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 07:29:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/gpu/drm/amd: Dynamically allocate
 kfd_processes_srcu v2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Having DEFINE_SRCU() or DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() in a loadable module
requires that the size of the reserved region be increased, which is
not something we really want to be doing.  This commit therefore removes
the DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c in
favor of defining kfd_processes_srcu as a simple srcu_struct, initializing
it in kfd_process_init(), and cleaning it up in kfd_process_fini().

v2 (Felix Kuehling): Move srcu init and cleanup into kfd_process.c

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehl...@amd.com>
Tested-by (v1): kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>
Cc: Oded Gabbay <oded.gab...@gmail.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <david1.z...@amd.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airl...@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
Cc: <dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c  |  8 ++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h    |  4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c
index 932007e..e8e2c15 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c
@@ -52,15 +52,15 @@ static int kfd_init(void)
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto err_topology;
 
-	err = kfd_process_create_wq();
+	err = kfd_process_init();
 	if (err < 0)
-		goto err_create_wq;
+		goto err_process;
 
 	kfd_debugfs_init();
 
 	return 0;
 
-err_create_wq:
+err_process:
 	kfd_topology_shutdown();
 err_topology:
 	kfd_chardev_exit();
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static int kfd_init(void)
 static void kfd_exit(void)
 {
 	kfd_debugfs_fini();
-	kfd_process_destroy_wq();
+	kfd_process_fini();
 	kfd_topology_shutdown();
 	kfd_chardev_exit();
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
index 9e02309..9dd187c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
@@ -708,8 +708,8 @@ struct amdkfd_ioctl_desc {
 };
 bool kfd_dev_is_large_bar(struct kfd_dev *dev);
 
-int kfd_process_create_wq(void);
-void kfd_process_destroy_wq(void);
+int kfd_process_init(void);
+void kfd_process_fini(void);
 struct kfd_process *kfd_create_process(struct file *filep);
 struct kfd_process *kfd_get_process(const struct task_struct *);
 struct kfd_process *kfd_lookup_process_by_pasid(unsigned int pasid);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
index 4bdae78..f810911 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ struct mm_struct;
 DEFINE_HASHTABLE(kfd_processes_table, KFD_PROCESS_TABLE_SIZE);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(kfd_processes_mutex);
 
-DEFINE_SRCU(kfd_processes_srcu);
+struct srcu_struct kfd_processes_srcu;
 
 /* For process termination handling */
 static struct workqueue_struct *kfd_process_wq;
@@ -69,22 +69,25 @@ static void evict_process_worker(struct work_struct *work);
 static void restore_process_worker(struct work_struct *work);
 
 
-int kfd_process_create_wq(void)
+int kfd_process_init(void)
 {
+	int ret;
+
 	if (!kfd_process_wq)
 		kfd_process_wq = alloc_workqueue("kfd_process_wq", 0, 0);
 	if (!kfd_restore_wq)
 		kfd_restore_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("kfd_restore_wq", 0);
 
-	if (!kfd_process_wq || !kfd_restore_wq) {
-		kfd_process_destroy_wq();
+	if (!kfd_process_wq || !kfd_restore_wq)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
 
-	return 0;
+	ret = init_srcu_struct(&kfd_processes_srcu);
+	WARN_ON(ret);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
-void kfd_process_destroy_wq(void)
+void kfd_process_fini(void)
 {
 	if (kfd_process_wq) {
 		destroy_workqueue(kfd_process_wq);
@@ -94,6 +97,8 @@ void kfd_process_destroy_wq(void)
 		destroy_workqueue(kfd_restore_wq);
 		kfd_restore_wq = NULL;
 	}
+
+	cleanup_srcu_struct(&kfd_processes_srcu);
 }
 
 static void kfd_process_free_gpuvm(struct kgd_mem *mem,
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to