[PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: remove redundant variable definition

[Chen, Guchun]

No need to define the same variables in each loop of the function.

Change-Id: Id8bbcc5a2ac87e9d31a72244345fde2d6bb99d42
Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.c...@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
index d0e020ef73e3..20af0a17d00b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
@@ -359,8 +359,9 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_process_recods(struct 
amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
                                            int num)
 {
        int i, ret = 0;
-       struct i2c_msg *msgs;
-       unsigned char *buffs;
+       struct i2c_msg *msgs, *msg;
+       unsigned char *buffs, *buff;
+       struct eeprom_table_record *record;
        struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(control);
 
        if (adev->asic_type != CHIP_VEGA20)
@@ -390,9 +391,9 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_process_recods(struct 
amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
         * 256b
         */
        for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
-               unsigned char *buff = &buffs[i * (EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + 
EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE)];
-               struct eeprom_table_record *record = &records[i];
-               struct i2c_msg *msg = &msgs[i];
+               buff = &buffs[i * (EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + 
EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE)];
+               record = &records[i];
+               msg = &msgs[i];
 
                control->next_addr = 
__correct_eeprom_dest_address(control->next_addr);
 
@@ -432,8 +433,8 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_process_recods(struct 
amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
 
        if (!write) {
                for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
-                       unsigned char *buff = &buffs[i*(EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + 
EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE)];
-                       struct eeprom_table_record *record = &records[i];
+                       buff = &buffs[i*(EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + 
EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE)];
+                       record = &records[i];
 
                        __decode_table_record_from_buff(control, record, buff + 
EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE);
                }
-- 
2.17.1

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx