[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]

Hi Alex,
    When we will cherry pick those patches to drm-next?

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Grodzovsky, Andrey <andrey.grodzov...@amd.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 11:10 AM
>To: Deng, Emily <emily.d...@amd.com>; Deucher, Alexander
><alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
>Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Koenig,
>Christian <christian.koe...@amd.com>; steven.pr...@arm.com
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drm/scheduler: Avoid accessing freed bad job.
>
>Yes - Christian just pushed it to drm-next-misc - I guess Alex/Christian 
>didn't pull
>to amd-staging-drm-next yet.
>
>Andrey
>
>On 12/2/19 2:24 PM, Deng, Emily wrote:
>> [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
>>
>> Hi Andrey,
>>      Seems this patch is still not in amd-staging-drm-next?
>>
>> Best wishes
>> Emily Deng
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Deng, Emily
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 4:41 PM
>>> To: Grodzovsky, Andrey <andrey.grodzov...@amd.com>
>>> Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org;
>>> Koenig, Christian <christian.koe...@amd.com>; steven.pr...@arm.com
>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] drm/scheduler: Avoid accessing freed bad job.
>>>
>>> [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Emily Deng <emily.d...@amd.com>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Grodzovsky, Andrey <andrey.grodzov...@amd.com>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 7:37 AM
>>>> Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org;
>>>> Koenig, Christian <christian.koe...@amd.com>; Deng, Emily
>>>> <emily.d...@amd.com>; steven.pr...@arm.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drm/scheduler: Avoid accessing freed bad job.
>>>>
>>>> Ping
>>>>
>>>> Andrey
>>>>
>>>> On 11/25/19 3:51 PM, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
>>>>> Problem:
>>>>> Due to a race between drm_sched_cleanup_jobs in sched thread and
>>>>> drm_sched_job_timedout in timeout work there is a possiblity that
>>>>> bad job was already freed while still being accessed from the
>>>>> timeout thread.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fix:
>>>>> Instead of just peeking at the bad job in the mirror list remove it
>>>>> from the list under lock and then put it back later when we are
>>>>> garanteed no race with main sched thread is possible which is after
>>>>> the thread is parked.
>>>>>
>>>>> v2: Lock around processing ring_mirror_list in drm_sched_cleanup_jobs.
>>>>>
>>>>> v3: Rebase on top of drm-misc-next. v2 is not needed anymore as
>>>>> drm_sched_get_cleanup_job already has a lock there.
>>>>>
>>>>> v4: Fix comments to relfect latest code in drm-misc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzov...@amd.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
>>>>> Tested-by: Emily Deng <emily.d...@amd.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 27
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>    1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>>> index 6774955..1bf9c40 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>>>> @@ -284,10 +284,21 @@ static void drm_sched_job_timedout(struct
>>>> work_struct *work)
>>>>>           unsigned long flags;
>>>>>
>>>>>           sched = container_of(work, struct drm_gpu_scheduler,
>>>>> work_tdr.work);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Protects against concurrent deletion in
>>>> drm_sched_get_cleanup_job */
>>>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>>>>>           job = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->ring_mirror_list,
>>>>>                                          struct drm_sched_job, node);
>>>>>
>>>>>           if (job) {
>>>>> +         /*
>>>>> +          * Remove the bad job so it cannot be freed by concurrent
>>>>> +          * drm_sched_cleanup_jobs. It will be reinserted back after
>>>> sched->thread
>>>>> +          * is parked at which point it's safe.
>>>>> +          */
>>>>> +         list_del_init(&job->node);
>>>>> +         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>>>>> +
>>>>>                   job->sched->ops->timedout_job(job);
>>>>>
>>>>>                   /*
>>>>> @@ -298,6 +309,8 @@ static void drm_sched_job_timedout(struct
>>>> work_struct *work)
>>>>>                           job->sched->ops->free_job(job);
>>>>>                           sched->free_guilty = false;
>>>>>                   }
>>>>> + } else {
>>>>> +         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->job_list_lock, flags);
>>>>>           }
>>>>>
>>>>>           spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->job_list_lock, flags); @@ -370,6
>>>>> +383,20 @@ void drm_sched_stop(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
>>>>> struct
>>>> drm_sched_job *bad)
>>>>>           kthread_park(sched->thread);
>>>>>
>>>>>           /*
>>>>> +  * Reinsert back the bad job here - now it's safe as
>>>>> +  * drm_sched_get_cleanup_job cannot race against us and release the
>>>>> +  * bad job at this point - we parked (waited for) any in progress
>>>>> +  * (earlier) cleanups and drm_sched_get_cleanup_job will not be
>>>> called
>>>>> +  * now until the scheduler thread is unparked.
>>>>> +  */
>>>>> + if (bad && bad->sched == sched)
>>>>> +         /*
>>>>> +          * Add at the head of the queue to reflect it was the earliest
>>>>> +          * job extracted.
>>>>> +          */
>>>>> +         list_add(&bad->node, &sched->ring_mirror_list);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>>            * Iterate the job list from later to  earlier one and either 
>>>>> deactive
>>>>>            * their HW callbacks or remove them from mirror list if they 
>>>>> already
>>>>>            * signaled.
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to