From: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lip...@amd.com>

[why]
drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_topology_state() should be renamed
to reflect more specific type of check. Since it is verifying
payload allocation limit it should be renamed into
drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_vcpi_alloc_limit()

Cc: Lyude Paul <ly...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lip...@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index f8b72ac79c66..ce21662f6144 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -4737,8 +4737,8 @@ int drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_bw_limit(struct 
drm_dp_mst_branch *branch,
 }
 
 static inline int
-drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_topology_state(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
-                                      struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state 
*mst_state)
+drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_vcpi_alloc_limit(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
+                                        struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state 
*mst_state)
 {
        struct drm_dp_vcpi_allocation *vcpi;
        int avail_slots = 63, payload_count = 0;
@@ -4864,7 +4864,7 @@ int drm_dp_mst_atomic_check(struct drm_atomic_state 
*state)
        int i, ret = 0;
 
        for_each_new_mst_mgr_in_state(state, mgr, mst_state, i) {
-               ret = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_topology_state(mgr, mst_state);
+               ret = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_vcpi_alloc_limit(mgr, mst_state);
                if (ret)
                        break;
                ret = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_bw_limit(mgr->mst_primary, 
mst_state);
-- 
2.17.1

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to