Hi, I got feedback from Linux team and they simply don't want to change.
I believe that it would work for bare metal as well. Jiange ________________________________ From: Deucher, Alexander <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 10:23 PM To: Zhao, Jiange <jiange.z...@amd.com>; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org> Cc: Deng, Emily <emily.d...@amd.com>; Liu, Monk <monk....@amd.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/sriov: Use VF-accessible register for gpu_clock_count [AMD Public Use] Is there any reason to not just use this for bare metal as well? Alex ________________________________ From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> on behalf of jianzh <jiange.z...@amd.com> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 6:21 AM To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org> Cc: Deng, Emily <emily.d...@amd.com>; Zhao, Jiange <jiange.z...@amd.com>; Liu, Monk <monk....@amd.com> Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/sriov: Use VF-accessible register for gpu_clock_count Navi12 VK CTS subtest timestamp.calibrated.dev_domain_test failed because mmRLC_CAPTURE_GPU_CLOCK_COUNT register cannot be written in VF due to security policy. Solution: use a VF-accessible timestamp register pair mmGOLDEN_TSC_COUNT_LOWER/UPPER for SRIOV case. Signed-off-by: jianzh <jiange.z...@amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c index 44f00ec..8787a46 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ #include "gc/gc_10_1_0_offset.h" #include "gc/gc_10_1_0_sh_mask.h" +#include "smuio/smuio_11_0_0_offset.h" +#include "smuio/smuio_11_0_0_sh_mask.h" #include "navi10_enum.h" #include "hdp/hdp_5_0_0_offset.h" #include "ivsrcid/gfx/irqsrcs_gfx_10_1.h" @@ -3920,9 +3922,14 @@ static uint64_t gfx_v10_0_get_gpu_clock_counter(struct amdgpu_device *adev) amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(adev, false); mutex_lock(&adev->gfx.gpu_clock_mutex); - WREG32_SOC15(GC, 0, mmRLC_CAPTURE_GPU_CLOCK_COUNT, 1); - clock = (uint64_t)RREG32_SOC15(GC, 0, mmRLC_GPU_CLOCK_COUNT_LSB) | - ((uint64_t)RREG32_SOC15(GC, 0, mmRLC_GPU_CLOCK_COUNT_MSB) << 32ULL); + if (!amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) { + WREG32_SOC15(GC, 0, mmRLC_CAPTURE_GPU_CLOCK_COUNT, 1); + clock = (uint64_t)RREG32_SOC15(GC, 0, mmRLC_GPU_CLOCK_COUNT_LSB) | + ((uint64_t)RREG32_SOC15(GC, 0, mmRLC_GPU_CLOCK_COUNT_MSB) << 32ULL); + } else { + clock = (uint64_t)RREG32_SOC15(SMUIO, 0, mmGOLDEN_TSC_COUNT_LOWER) | + ((uint64_t)RREG32_SOC15(SMUIO, 0, mmGOLDEN_TSC_COUNT_UPPER) << 32ULL); + } mutex_unlock(&adev->gfx.gpu_clock_mutex); amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(adev, true); return clock; -- 2.7.4 _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=02%7C01%7Calexander.deucher%40amd.com%7C9b14a49e41fd48f7138f08d7bb773ed9%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637183993593225894&sdata=jFUVpgeEcTTJbTJ3a7ibAPOyAU3RVF%2FEIN41zaqS0eM%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx