Am 28.02.20 um 07:31 schrieb Yintian Tao:
The TDR will be randomly failed due to compute ring
test failure. If the compute ring wptr & 0x7ff(ring_buf_mask)
is 0x100 then after map mqd the compute ring rptr will be
synced with 0x100. And the ring test packet size is also 0x100.
Then after invocation of amdgpu_ring_commit, the cp will not
really handle the packet on the ring buffer because rptr is equal to wptr.
Signed-off-by: Yintian Tao <yt...@amd.com>
Of hand that looks correct to me, but I can't fully judge if that won't
have any negative side effects. Patch is Acked-by: Christian König
<christian.koe...@amd.com> for now.
Monk according to git you modified that function as well. Could this
have any potential negative effect for SRIOV? I don't think so, but
better save than sorry.
Regards,
Christian.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c
index 44f00ecea322..5df1a6d45457 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c
@@ -3508,6 +3508,7 @@ static int gfx_v10_0_kcq_init_queue(struct amdgpu_ring
*ring)
/* reset ring buffer */
ring->wptr = 0;
+ atomic64_set((atomic64_t *)&adev->wb.wb[ring->wptr_offs], 0);
amdgpu_ring_clear_ring(ring);
} else {
amdgpu_ring_clear_ring(ring);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
index 4135e4126e82..ac22490e8656 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
@@ -3664,6 +3664,7 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_kcq_init_queue(struct amdgpu_ring
*ring)
/* reset ring buffer */
ring->wptr = 0;
+ atomic64_set((atomic64_t *)&adev->wb.wb[ring->wptr_offs], 0);
amdgpu_ring_clear_ring(ring);
} else {
amdgpu_ring_clear_ring(ring);
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
