On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:55:37AM +0800, Prike Liang wrote:
> This fix will handle some MP1 FW issue like as mclk dpm table in
> renoir has a reverse dpm clock layout and a zero frequency dpm level
> as following case.
> 
> cat pp_dpm_mclk
> 0: 1200Mhz
> 1: 1200Mhz
> 2: 800Mhz
> 3: 0Mhz
> 
> Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <prike.li...@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smu_v12_0.c  | 3 ---
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
> index e3398f9..d454493 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ int smu_set_soft_freq_range(struct smu_context *smu, enum 
> smu_clk_type clk_type,
>  {
>       int ret = 0;
>  
> -     if (min <= 0 && max <= 0)
> +     if (min < 0 && max < 0)

This change causes the following Coverity warning because min and max
are both unsigned:

int smu_set_soft_freq_range(struct smu_context *smu, enum smu_clk_type clk_type,
                            uint32_t min, uint32_t max)

>>>     CID 1460516:  Integer handling issues  (NO_EFFECT)
>>>     This less-than-zero comparison of an unsigned value is never true. "min 
>>> < 0U".
225             if (min < 0 && max < 0)
226                     return -EINVAL;

>               return -EINVAL;
>  
>       if (!smu_clk_dpm_is_enabled(smu, clk_type))
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to