Am 21.04.20 um 09:36 schrieb Bernard Zhao:
Maybe we could reduce the mutex_lock(&mem->lock)`s protected code area,
and no need to protect pr_debug.
Well that change looks rather superfluous to me.
This is for freeing memory which by definition can only be done once and
so the should be exactly zero contention on the lock except in a case of
an error.
Regards,
Christian.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bern...@vivo.com>
Changes since V1:
*commit message improve
Changes since V2:
*move comment along with the mutex_unlock
Changes since V3:
*lock protect the if check, there is some possibility of multi-threaded
racing modify.
Link for V1:
*https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Fpatchwork%2Fpatch%2F1226588%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C9f2b2080f4174c421e4f08d7e5c6b899%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637230513976133424&sdata=6wezM%2F%2FjM5uuLblJejS9XFlE9DjWQ5zSt5PsqrfvCVo%3D&reserved=0
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
index 327317c54f7c..549bdb429883 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
@@ -1289,9 +1289,9 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu(
mutex_lock(&mem->lock);
if (mem->mapped_to_gpu_memory > 0) {
+ mutex_unlock(&mem->lock);
pr_debug("BO VA 0x%llx size 0x%lx is still mapped.\n",
mem->va, bo_size);
- mutex_unlock(&mem->lock);
return -EBUSY;
}
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx