Lockdep is spewing circular locking dependency warning when
reading SDMA usage stats.
150.887733] ======================================================
[ 150.893903] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 150.905917] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 150.912129] kfdtest/4081 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 150.917002] ffff8f7f3762e118 (&mm->mmap_sem#2){++++}, at:
__might_fault+0x3e/0x90
[ 150.924490]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 150.930320] ffff8f7f49d229e8 (&dqm->lock_hidden){+.+.}, at:
destroy_queue_cpsch+0x29/0x210 [amdgpu]
[ 150.939432]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 150.947603]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 150.955074]
-> #3 (&dqm->lock_hidden){+.+.}:
[ 150.960822] __mutex_lock+0xa1/0x9f0
[ 150.964996] evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x22/0x120 [amdgpu]
[ 150.971155] kfd_process_evict_queues+0x3b/0xc0 [amdgpu]
[ 150.977054] kgd2kfd_quiesce_mm+0x25/0x60 [amdgpu]
[ 150.982442] amdgpu_amdkfd_evict_userptr+0x35/0x70 [amdgpu]
[ 150.988615] amdgpu_mn_invalidate_hsa+0x41/0x60 [amdgpu]
[ 150.994448] __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0xa4/0x240
[ 151.000714] copy_page_range+0xd70/0xd80
[ 151.005159] dup_mm+0x3ca/0x550
[ 151.008816] copy_process+0x1bdc/0x1c70
[ 151.013183] _do_fork+0x76/0x6c0
[ 151.016929] __x64_sys_clone+0x8c/0xb0
[ 151.021201] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x1d0
[ 151.025404] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[ 151.030977]
-> #2 (&adev->notifier_lock){+.+.}:
[ 151.036993] __mutex_lock+0xa1/0x9f0
[ 151.041168] amdgpu_mn_invalidate_hsa+0x30/0x60 [amdgpu]
[ 151.047019] __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0xa4/0x240
[ 151.053277] copy_page_range+0xd70/0xd80
[ 151.057722] dup_mm+0x3ca/0x550
[ 151.061388] copy_process+0x1bdc/0x1c70
[ 151.065748] _do_fork+0x76/0x6c0
[ 151.069499] __x64_sys_clone+0x8c/0xb0
[ 151.073765] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x1d0
[ 151.077952] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[ 151.083523]
-> #1 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}:
[ 151.090833] change_protection+0x802/0xab0
[ 151.095448] mprotect_fixup+0x187/0x2d0
[ 151.099801] setup_arg_pages+0x124/0x250
[ 151.104251] load_elf_binary+0x3a4/0x1464
[ 151.108781] search_binary_handler+0x6c/0x210
[ 151.113656] __do_execve_file.isra.40+0x7f7/0xa50
[ 151.118875] do_execve+0x21/0x30
[ 151.122632] call_usermodehelper_exec_async+0x17e/0x190
[ 151.128393] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
[ 151.132489]
-> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem#2){++++}:
[ 151.138064] __lock_acquire+0x11a1/0x1490
[ 151.142597] lock_acquire+0x90/0x180
[ 151.146694] __might_fault+0x68/0x90
[ 151.150879] read_sdma_queue_counter+0x5f/0xb0 [amdgpu]
[ 151.156693] update_sdma_queue_past_activity_stats+0x3b/0x90 [amdgpu]
[ 151.163725] destroy_queue_cpsch+0x1ae/0x210 [amdgpu]
[ 151.169373] pqm_destroy_queue+0xf0/0x250 [amdgpu]
[ 151.174762] kfd_ioctl_destroy_queue+0x32/0x70 [amdgpu]
[ 151.180577] kfd_ioctl+0x223/0x400 [amdgpu]
[ 151.185284] ksys_ioctl+0x8f/0xb0
[ 151.189118] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
[ 151.193389] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x1d0
[ 151.197569] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[ 151.203141]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 151.211140] Chain exists of:
&mm->mmap_sem#2 --> &adev->notifier_lock --> &dqm->lock_hidden
151.222535] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 151.228447] CPU0 CPU1
[ 151.232971] ---- ----
[ 151.237502] lock(&dqm->lock_hidden);
[ 151.241254] lock(&adev->notifier_lock);
[ 151.247774] lock(&dqm->lock_hidden);
[ 151.254038] lock(&mm->mmap_sem#2);
[ 151.257610]
This commit fixes the warning by ensuring get_user() is not called
while reading SDMA stats with dqm_lock held as get_user() could cause a
page fault which leads to the circular locking scenario.
Signed-off-by: Mukul Joshi <mukul.jo...@amd.com>
---
.../drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c | 36 +++---
.../drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.h | 3 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c | 120 +++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c
index 21eb0998c4ae..204612de3dbc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c
@@ -153,24 +153,23 @@ static void decrement_queue_count(struct
device_queue_manager *dqm,
dqm->active_cp_queue_count--;
}
-int read_sdma_queue_counter(struct queue *q, uint64_t *val)
+int read_sdma_queue_counter(uint64_t q_rptr, uint64_t *val)
{
int ret;
uint64_t tmp = 0;
- if (!q || !val)
+ if (!val)
return -EINVAL;
/*
* SDMA activity counter is stored at queue's RPTR + 0x8 location.
*/
- if (!access_ok((const void __user *)((uint64_t)q->properties.read_ptr +
+ if (!access_ok((const void __user *)(q_rptr +
sizeof(uint64_t)), sizeof(uint64_t))) {
pr_err("Can't access sdma queue activity counter\n");
return -EFAULT;
}
- ret = get_user(tmp, (uint64_t *)((uint64_t)(q->properties.read_ptr) +
- sizeof(uint64_t)));
+ ret = get_user(tmp, (uint64_t *)(q_rptr + sizeof(uint64_t)));
if (!ret) {
*val = tmp;
}
@@ -187,14 +186,15 @@ static int update_sdma_queue_past_activity_stats(struct
kfd_process_device *pdd,
if (!pdd)
return -ENODEV;
- ret = read_sdma_queue_counter(q, &val);
+ ret = read_sdma_queue_counter((uint64_t)q->properties.read_ptr, &val);
if (ret) {
pr_err("Failed to read SDMA queue counter for queue: %d\n",
q->properties.queue_id);
return ret;
}
- pdd->sdma_past_activity_counter += val;
+ WRITE_ONCE(pdd->sdma_past_activity_counter,
+ pdd->sdma_past_activity_counter + val);
return ret;
}
@@ -533,11 +533,6 @@ static int destroy_queue_nocpsch_locked(struct
device_queue_manager *dqm,
if (retval == -ETIME)
qpd->reset_wavefronts = true;
- /* Get the SDMA queue stats */
- if ((q->properties.type == KFD_QUEUE_TYPE_SDMA) ||
- (q->properties.type == KFD_QUEUE_TYPE_SDMA_XGMI)) {
- update_sdma_queue_past_activity_stats(qpd_to_pdd(qpd), q);
- }
mqd_mgr->free_mqd(mqd_mgr, q->mqd, q->mqd_mem_obj);
@@ -578,6 +573,12 @@ static int destroy_queue_nocpsch(struct
device_queue_manager *dqm,
retval = destroy_queue_nocpsch_locked(dqm, qpd, q);
dqm_unlock(dqm);
+ /* Get the SDMA queue stats */
+ if ((q->properties.type == KFD_QUEUE_TYPE_SDMA) ||
+ (q->properties.type == KFD_QUEUE_TYPE_SDMA_XGMI)) {
+ update_sdma_queue_past_activity_stats(qpd_to_pdd(qpd), q);
+ }
+
return retval;
}
@@ -1520,11 +1521,6 @@ static int destroy_queue_cpsch(struct
device_queue_manager *dqm,
}
}
- /* Get the SDMA queue stats */
- if ((q->properties.type == KFD_QUEUE_TYPE_SDMA) ||
- (q->properties.type == KFD_QUEUE_TYPE_SDMA_XGMI)) {
- update_sdma_queue_past_activity_stats(qpd_to_pdd(qpd), q);
- }
/*
* Unconditionally decrement this counter, regardless of the queue's
* type
@@ -1535,6 +1531,12 @@ static int destroy_queue_cpsch(struct
device_queue_manager *dqm,
dqm_unlock(dqm);
+ /* Get the SDMA queue stats */
+ if ((q->properties.type == KFD_QUEUE_TYPE_SDMA) ||
+ (q->properties.type == KFD_QUEUE_TYPE_SDMA_XGMI)) {
+ update_sdma_queue_past_activity_stats(qpd_to_pdd(qpd), q);
+ }
+
/* Do free_mqd after dqm_unlock(dqm) to avoid circular locking */
mqd_mgr->free_mqd(mqd_mgr, q->mqd, q->mqd_mem_obj);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.h
index 894bcf877f9e..49d8e324c636 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.h
@@ -251,6 +251,5 @@ static inline void dqm_unlock(struct device_queue_manager
*dqm)
mutex_unlock(&dqm->lock_hidden);
}
-int read_sdma_queue_counter(struct queue *q, uint64_t *val);
-
+int read_sdma_queue_counter(uint64_t q_rptr, uint64_t *val);
#endif /* KFD_DEVICE_QUEUE_MANAGER_H_ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
index 8616a204e4c3..07286b535b20 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
@@ -86,6 +86,13 @@ struct kfd_sdma_activity_handler_workarea {
uint64_t sdma_activity_counter;
};
+struct temp_sdma_queue_list {
+ uint64_t rptr;
+ uint64_t sdma_val;
+ unsigned int queue_id;
+ struct list_head list;
+};
+
static void kfd_sdma_activity_worker(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct kfd_sdma_activity_handler_workarea *workarea;
@@ -96,6 +103,8 @@ static void kfd_sdma_activity_worker(struct work_struct
*work)
struct qcm_process_device *qpd;
struct device_queue_manager *dqm;
int ret = 0;
+ struct temp_sdma_queue_list sdma_q_list;
+ struct temp_sdma_queue_list *sdma_q, *next;
workarea = container_of(work, struct kfd_sdma_activity_handler_workarea,
sdma_activity_work);
@@ -109,7 +118,59 @@ static void kfd_sdma_activity_worker(struct work_struct
*work)
qpd = &pdd->qpd;
if (!dqm || !qpd)
return;
+ /*
+ * Total SDMA activity is current SDMA activity + past SDMA activity
+ * Past SDMA count is stored in pdd.
+ * To get the current activity counters for all active SDMA queues,
+ * we loop over all SDMA queues and get their counts from user-space.
+ *
+ * We cannot call get_user() with dqm_lock held as it can cause
+ * a circular lock dependency situation. To read the SDMA stats,
+ * we need to do the following:
+ *
+ * 1. Create a temporary list of SDMA queue nodes from the
qpd->queues_list,
+ * with dqm_lock/dqm_unlock().
+ * 2. Call get_user() for each node in temporary list without dqm_lock.
+ * Save the SDMA count for each node and also add the count to the
total
+ * SDMA count counter.
+ * Its possible, during this step, a few SDMA queue nodes got deleted
+ * from the qpd->queues_list.
+ * 3. Do a second pass over qpd->queues_list to check if any nodes got
deleted.
+ * If any node got deleted, its SDMA count would be captured in the
sdma
+ * past activity counter. So subtract the SDMA counter stored in
step 2
+ * for this node from the total SDMA count.
+ */
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sdma_q_list.list);
+
+ /*
+ * Create the temp list of all SDMA queues
+ */
+ dqm_lock(dqm);
+ list_for_each_entry(q, &qpd->queues_list, list) {
+ if ((q->properties.type == KFD_QUEUE_TYPE_SDMA) ||
+ (q->properties.type == KFD_QUEUE_TYPE_SDMA_XGMI)) {
+ sdma_q = kzalloc(sizeof(struct temp_sdma_queue_list),
GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!sdma_q)
+ return;
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sdma_q->list);
+ sdma_q->rptr = (uint64_t)q->properties.read_ptr;
+ sdma_q->queue_id = q->properties.queue_id;
+ list_add_tail(&sdma_q->list, &sdma_q_list.list);
+ }
+ }
+
+ dqm_unlock(dqm);
+
+ if (list_empty(&sdma_q_list.list)) {
+ workarea->sdma_activity_counter =
READ_ONCE(pdd->sdma_past_activity_counter);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Get the usage count for each SDMA queue in temp_list.
+ */
mm = get_task_mm(pdd->process->lead_thread);
if (!mm) {
return;
@@ -117,33 +178,60 @@ static void kfd_sdma_activity_worker(struct work_struct
*work)
use_mm(mm);
- dqm_lock(dqm);
+ list_for_each_entry(sdma_q, &sdma_q_list.list, list) {
+ val = 0;
+ ret = read_sdma_queue_counter(sdma_q->rptr, &val);
+ if (ret)
+ pr_debug("Failed to read SDMA queue active "
+ "counter for queue id: %d",
+ sdma_q->queue_id);
+ else {
+ sdma_q->sdma_val = val;
+ workarea->sdma_activity_counter += val;
+ }
+ }
- /*
- * Total SDMA activity is current SDMA activity + past SDMA activity
- */
- workarea->sdma_activity_counter = pdd->sdma_past_activity_counter;
+ unuse_mm(mm);
+ mmput(mm);
/*
- * Get the current activity counters for all active SDMA queues
+ * Do a second iteration over qpd_queues_list to check if any SDMA
+ * nodes got deleted while fetching SDMA counter.
*/
+ dqm_lock(dqm);
+
+ workarea->sdma_activity_counter +=
READ_ONCE(pdd->sdma_past_activity_counter);
+
list_for_each_entry(q, &qpd->queues_list, list) {
+ if (list_empty(&sdma_q_list.list)) {
+ break;
+ }
+
if ((q->properties.type == KFD_QUEUE_TYPE_SDMA) ||
(q->properties.type == KFD_QUEUE_TYPE_SDMA_XGMI)) {
- val = 0;
- ret = read_sdma_queue_counter(q, &val);
- if (ret)
- pr_debug("Failed to read SDMA queue active "
- "counter for queue id: %d",
- q->properties.queue_id);
- else
- workarea->sdma_activity_counter += val;
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(sdma_q, next,
&sdma_q_list.list, list) {
+ if (((uint64_t)q->properties.read_ptr ==
sdma_q->rptr) &&
+ (sdma_q->queue_id ==
q->properties.queue_id)) {
+ list_del(&sdma_q->list);
+ kfree(sdma_q);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
}
}
dqm_unlock(dqm);
- unuse_mm(mm);
- mmput(mm);
+
+ /*
+ * If temp list is not empty, it implies some queues got deleted
+ * from qpd->queues_list during SDMA usage read. Subtract the SDMA
+ * count for each node from the total SDMA count.
+ */
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(sdma_q, next, &sdma_q_list.list, list) {
+ workarea->sdma_activity_counter -= sdma_q->sdma_val;
+ list_del(&sdma_q->list);
+ kfree(sdma_q);
+ }
}
static ssize_t kfd_procfs_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
