During preemption test for gfx10, it uses kiq to trigger gfx preemption, which would result in race condition with flushing TLB for kiq.
Signed-off-by: Jack Xiao <jack.x...@amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c index a6170a346b39..ddf6d8128753 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c @@ -7836,12 +7836,17 @@ static int gfx_v10_0_ring_preempt_ib(struct amdgpu_ring *ring) struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev; struct amdgpu_kiq *kiq = &adev->gfx.kiq; struct amdgpu_ring *kiq_ring = &kiq->ring; + unsigned long flags; if (!kiq->pmf || !kiq->pmf->kiq_unmap_queues) return -EINVAL; - if (amdgpu_ring_alloc(kiq_ring, kiq->pmf->unmap_queues_size)) + spin_lock_irqsave(&kiq->ring_lock, flags); + + if (amdgpu_ring_alloc(kiq_ring, kiq->pmf->unmap_queues_size)) { + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kiq->ring_lock, flags); return -ENOMEM; + } /* assert preemption condition */ amdgpu_ring_set_preempt_cond_exec(ring, false); @@ -7852,6 +7857,8 @@ static int gfx_v10_0_ring_preempt_ib(struct amdgpu_ring *ring) ++ring->trail_seq); amdgpu_ring_commit(kiq_ring); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kiq->ring_lock, flags); + /* poll the trailing fence */ for (i = 0; i < adev->usec_timeout; i++) { if (ring->trail_seq == -- 2.26.2 _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx