On 2020-08-21 8:07 p.m., Kazlauskas, Nicholas wrote: > On 2020-08-21 12:57 p.m., Michel Dänzer wrote: >> From: Michel Dänzer <mdaen...@redhat.com> >> >> Don't check drm_crtc_state::active for this either, per its >> documentation in include/drm/drm_crtc.h: >> >> * Hence drivers must not consult @active in their various >> * &drm_mode_config_funcs.atomic_check callback to reject an atomic >> * commit. >> >> The atomic helpers disable the CRTC as needed for disabling the primary >> plane. >> >> This prevents at least the following problems if the primary plane gets >> disabled (e.g. due to destroying the FB assigned to the primary plane, >> as happens e.g. with mutter in Wayland mode): >> >> * Toggling CRTC active to 1 failed if the cursor plane was enabled >> (e.g. via legacy DPMS property & cursor ioctl). >> * Enabling the cursor plane failed, e.g. via the legacy cursor ioctl. > > We previously had the requirement that the primary plane must be enabled > but some userspace expects that they can enable just the overlay plane > without anything else. > > I think the chromuiumos atomictest validates that this works as well: > > So is DRM going forward then with the expectation that this is wrong > behavior from userspace? > > We require at least one plane to be enabled to display a cursor, but it > doesn't necessarily need to be the primary.
It's a "pick your poison" situation: 1) Currently the checks are invalid (atomic_check must not decide based on drm_crtc_state::active), and it's easy for legacy KMS userspace to accidentally hit errors trying to enable/move the cursor or switch DPMS off → on. 2) Accurately rejecting only atomic states where the cursor plane is enabled but all other planes are off would break the KMS helper code, which can only deal with the "CRTC on & primary plane off is not allowed" case specifically. 3) This patch addresses 1) & 2) but may break existing atomic userspace which wants to enable an overlay plane while disabling the primary plane. I do think in principle atomic userspace is expected to handle case 3) and leave the primary plane enabled. However, this is not ideal from an energy consumption PoV. Therefore, here's another idea for a possible way out of this quagmire: amdgpu_dm does not reject any atomic states based on which planes are enabled in it. If the cursor plane is enabled but all other planes are off, amdgpu_dm internally either: a) Enables an overlay plane and makes it invisible, e.g. by assigning a minimum size FB with alpha = 0. b) Enables the primary plane and assigns a minimum size FB (scaled up to the required size) containing all black, possibly using compression. (Trying to minimize the memory bandwidth) Does either of these seem feasible? If both do, which one would be preferable? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | https://redhat.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
