It makes nonsense to call gfxoff  when smu failure has happened.

Regards,
Jiansong
-----Original Message-----
From: Chen, Guchun <guchun.c...@amd.com> 
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 4:14 PM
To: Chen, Jiansong (Simon) <jiansong.c...@amd.com>; 
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Zhou1, Tao <tao.zh...@amd.com>; Feng, Kenneth <kenneth.f...@amd.com>; Quan, 
Evan <evan.q...@amd.com>; Chen, Jiansong (Simon) <jiansong.c...@amd.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm: support runtime pptable update for 
sienna_cichlid etc.

[AMD Public Use]

ret = smu_late_init(adev);
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;

One counter leak happens? It needs to call amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(smu->adev, true) 
before returning?

Regards,
Guchun

-----Original Message-----
From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Jiansong Chen
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 4:10 PM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Zhou1, Tao <tao.zh...@amd.com>; Feng, Kenneth <kenneth.f...@amd.com>; Quan, 
Evan <evan.q...@amd.com>; Chen, Jiansong (Simon) <jiansong.c...@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm: support runtime pptable update for sienna_cichlid 
etc.

This avoids smu issue when enabling runtime pptable update for sienna_cichlid 
and so on. Runtime pptable udpate is needed for test and debug purpose.

Signed-off-by: Jiansong Chen <jiansong.c...@amd.com>
Change-Id: I70b704ab4d6efd169f579c392e5dbc2737dc1fb2
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
index 7a55ece1f124..7618f9972b8c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
@@ -1129,7 +1129,7 @@ static int smu_disable_dpms(struct smu_context *smu)
         */
        if (smu->uploading_custom_pp_table &&
            (adev->asic_type >= CHIP_NAVI10) &&
-           (adev->asic_type <= CHIP_NAVI12))
+           (adev->asic_type <= CHIP_NAVY_FLOUNDER))
                return 0;
 
        /*
@@ -1214,7 +1214,9 @@ static int smu_hw_fini(void *handle)  int 
smu_reset(struct smu_context *smu)  {
        struct amdgpu_device *adev = smu->adev;
-       int ret = 0;
+       int ret;
+
+       amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(smu->adev, false);
 
        ret = smu_hw_fini(adev);
        if (ret)
@@ -1225,8 +1227,12 @@ int smu_reset(struct smu_context *smu)
                return ret;
 
        ret = smu_late_init(adev);
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;
 
-       return ret;
+       amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(smu->adev, true);
+
+       return 0;
 }
 
 static int smu_suspend(void *handle)
--
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cguchun.chen%40amd.com%7Cd73dd73ccf3c444c710508d858859f53%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637356678262125090&amp;sdata=p0sqrDLhD4vaNesLHIq6Jfd57sAeu8wHDH69bDwTAvA%3D&amp;reserved=0
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to