After fixing nested FPU contexts caused by 41401ac67791 we're still seeing
complaints about spurious kernel_fpu_end(). As it turns out this was
already fixed for dcn20 in commit f41ed88cbd ("drm/amdgpu/display:
use GFP_ATOMIC in dcn20_validate_bandwidth_internal") but never moved
forward to dcn21.

Signed-off-by: Holger Hoffstätte <hol...@applied-asynchrony.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn21/dcn21_resource.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn21/dcn21_resource.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn21/dcn21_resource.c
index 072f8c880924..1acadf9f5619 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn21/dcn21_resource.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn21/dcn21_resource.c
@@ -1339,7 +1339,7 @@ static noinline bool dcn21_validate_bandwidth_fp(struct 
dc *dc,
        int vlevel = 0;
        int pipe_split_from[MAX_PIPES];
        int pipe_cnt = 0;
-       display_e2e_pipe_params_st *pipes = kzalloc(dc->res_pool->pipe_count * 
sizeof(display_e2e_pipe_params_st), GFP_KERNEL);
+       display_e2e_pipe_params_st *pipes = kzalloc(dc->res_pool->pipe_count * 
sizeof(display_e2e_pipe_params_st), GFP_ATOMIC);
        DC_LOGGER_INIT(dc->ctx->logger);
BW_VAL_TRACE_COUNT();
--
2.30.1
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to