For BACO scenario, PMFW will handle the dpm features disablement and interaction with RLC properly. Driver involvement is unnecessary and error prone.
Change-Id: I19363fc08568be4b7d3f2ec6eba21ccf8fff6c37 Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.q...@amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c index fd7b1b8edeb7..e3e309bb086d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c @@ -1393,7 +1393,8 @@ static int smu_disable_dpms(struct smu_context *smu) * For Sienna_Cichlid, PMFW will handle the features disablement properly * on BACO in. Driver involvement is unnecessary. */ - if ((adev->asic_type == CHIP_SIENNA_CICHLID) && + if (((adev->asic_type == CHIP_SIENNA_CICHLID) || + ((adev->asic_type >= CHIP_NAVI10) && (adev->asic_type <= CHIP_NAVI12))) && use_baco) { smu_reset_cached_dpm_feature_status(smu); return 0; -- 2.29.0 _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx