On 2021-10-19 14:22, Russell, Kent wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only]
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kuehling, Felix <felix.kuehl...@amd.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 2:09 PM
>> To: Russell, Kent <kent.russ...@amd.com>; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Tuikov, Luben <luben.tui...@amd.com>; Joshi, Mukul <mukul.jo...@amd.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/amdgpu: Warn when bad pages approaches threshold
>>
>> Am 2021-10-19 um 1:50 p.m. schrieb Kent Russell:
>>> Currently dmesg doesn't warn when the number of bad pages approaches the
>>> threshold for page retirement. WARN when the number of bad pages
>>> is at 90% or greater for easier checks and planning, instead of waiting
>>> until the GPU is full of bad pages
>>>
>>> Cc: Luben Tuikov <luben.tui...@amd.com>
>>> Cc: Mukul Joshi <mukul.jo...@amd.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kent Russell <kent.russ...@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
>>> index 98732518543e..8270aad23a06 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
>>> @@ -1077,6 +1077,16 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_init(struct
>> amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
>>> if (res)
>>> DRM_ERROR("RAS table incorrect checksum or error:%d\n",
>>> res);
>>> +
>>> + /* threshold = -1 is automatic, threshold = 0 means that page
>>> + * retirement is disabled.
>>> + */
>>> + if (amdgpu_bad_page_threshold > 0 &&
>>> + control->ras_num_recs >= 0 &&
>>> + control->ras_num_recs >= (amdgpu_bad_page_threshold * 9 /
>>> 10))
>>> + DRM_WARN("RAS records:%u approaching threshold:%d",
>>> + control->ras_num_recs,
>>> + amdgpu_bad_page_threshold);
>> This won't work for the default setting amdgpu_bad_page_threshold=-1.
>> For this case, you'd have to take the threshold from
>> ras->bad_page_cnt_threshold.
> Yep, completely missed that. Thanks, I'll fix that up.
Please also fix the round off, third conditional:
a >= b * 9/10 <==> 10*a >= 9*b
Then, you can also drop the second line, since from the first:
b > 0 ==> 10*a >= 9*b > 0 ==> 10a > 0 ==> a > 0.
Which shows that,
b > 0 && 10*a >= 9*b
is true iff a and b are both greater than 0, so you don't need
the middle line of the check.
Also in your message, say something like:
DRM_WARN("RAS records:%u approaching a 90% threshold:%d",
control->ras_num_recs,
amdgpu_bad_page_threshold);
Regards,
Luben
>
> Kent
>> Regards,
>> Felix
>>
>>
>>> } else if (hdr->header == RAS_TABLE_HDR_BAD &&
>>> amdgpu_bad_page_threshold != 0) {
>>> res = __verify_ras_table_checksum(control);
