I'm scratching my head what you are doing here?

That's the fives time you send out the same patch, so something is going wrong here :)

Please double check why that lands in your outbox over and over again.

Regards,
Christian.

Am 08.02.22 um 09:14 schrieb zhanglianjie:
after the buffer object is successfully mapped, call radeon_bo_kunmap before 
the function returns.

Signed-off-by: zhanglianjie <zhanglian...@uniontech.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
index 377f9cdb5b53..0558d928d98d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
@@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, 
struct radeon_bo *bo,
        handle = msg[2];

        if (handle == 0) {
+               radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
                DRM_ERROR("Invalid UVD handle!\n");
                return -EINVAL;
        }
@@ -559,12 +560,10 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, 
struct radeon_bo *bo,
                return 0;

        default:
-
                DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
-               return -EINVAL;
        }

-       BUG();
+       radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
        return -EINVAL;
  }

--
2.20.1




Reply via email to