[AMD Official Use Only]

OK, if there is further refinement, the series is:

Reviewed-by: Tao Zhou <tao.zh...@amd.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chai, Thomas <yipeng.c...@amd.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2022 10:59 AM
> To: Zhou1, Tao <tao.zh...@amd.com>; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Zhang, Hawking <hawking.zh...@amd.com>; Clements, John
> <john.cleme...@amd.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 03/11] drm/amdgpu: Optimize
> amdgpu_hdp_ras_late_init/amdgpu_hdp_ras_fini function code
> 
> [AMD Official Use Only]
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhou1, Tao <tao.zh...@amd.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 4:54 PM
> To: Chai, Thomas <yipeng.c...@amd.com>; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Zhang, Hawking <hawking.zh...@amd.com>; Clements, John
> <john.cleme...@amd.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 03/11] drm/amdgpu: Optimize
> amdgpu_hdp_ras_late_init/amdgpu_hdp_ras_fini function code
> 
> [AMD Official Use Only]
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chai, Thomas <yipeng.c...@amd.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 1:57 PM
> > To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: Chai, Thomas <yipeng.c...@amd.com>; Zhang, Hawking
> > <hawking.zh...@amd.com>; Zhou1, Tao <tao.zh...@amd.com>; Clements,
> > John <john.cleme...@amd.com>; Chai, Thomas <yipeng.c...@amd.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH 03/11] drm/amdgpu: Optimize
> > amdgpu_hdp_ras_late_init/amdgpu_hdp_ras_fini function code
> >
> > Optimize amdgpu_hdp_ras_late_init/amdgpu_hdp_ras_fini function code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: yipechai <yipeng.c...@amd.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_hdp.c | 37 ++-----------------------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c   |  1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/hdp_v4_0.c   |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_hdp.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_hdp.c
> > index 518966a26130..21a5f884dd2a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_hdp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_hdp.c
> > @@ -26,43 +26,12 @@
> >
> >  int amdgpu_hdp_ras_late_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev, void *ras_info)  {
> > -   int r;
> > -   struct ras_ih_if ih_info = {
> > -           .cb = NULL,
> > -   };
> > -   struct ras_fs_if fs_info = {
> > -           .sysfs_name = "hdp_err_count",
> > -   };
> > -
> > -   if (!adev->hdp.ras_if) {
> > -           adev->hdp.ras_if = kmalloc(sizeof(struct ras_common_if),
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > -           if (!adev->hdp.ras_if)
> > -                   return -ENOMEM;
> > -           adev->hdp.ras_if->block = AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__HDP;
> > -           adev->hdp.ras_if->type =
> > AMDGPU_RAS_ERROR__MULTI_UNCORRECTABLE;
> > -           adev->hdp.ras_if->sub_block_index = 0;
> > -   }
> > -   ih_info.head = fs_info.head = *adev->hdp.ras_if;
> > -   r = amdgpu_ras_late_init(adev, adev->hdp.ras_if,
> > -                            &fs_info, &ih_info);
> > -   if (r || !amdgpu_ras_is_supported(adev, adev->hdp.ras_if->block)) {
> > -           kfree(adev->hdp.ras_if);
> > -           adev->hdp.ras_if = NULL;
> > -   }
> > -
> > -   return r;
> > +   return amdgpu_ras_block_late_init(adev, adev->hdp.ras_if);
> >  }
> >
> >  void amdgpu_hdp_ras_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev)  {
> >     if (amdgpu_ras_is_supported(adev, AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__HDP) &&
> > -       adev->hdp.ras_if) {
> > -           struct ras_common_if *ras_if = adev->hdp.ras_if;
> > -           struct ras_ih_if ih_info = {
> > -                   .cb = NULL,
> > -           };
> > -
> > -           amdgpu_ras_late_fini(adev, ras_if, &ih_info);
> > -           kfree(ras_if);
> > -   }
> > +       adev->hdp.ras_if)
> > +           amdgpu_ras_block_late_fini(adev, adev->hdp.ras_if);
> >  }
> >[Tao]: Since hdp_ras_late_init/fini are simple wrapper, can we remove them
> and call amdgpu_ras_block_late_init/fini directly?
> >The same comment to other blocks.
> 
> [Thomas] Compared with amdgpu_ras_block_late_init/fin,
> hdp_ras_late_init/fini have different function interface parameters.
>                  But can do it as a new ticket later.
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> > index af873c99d5e4..b12fe6703f02 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> > @@ -1302,6 +1302,7 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_set_hdp_ras_funcs(struct
> > amdgpu_device *adev)  {
> >     adev->hdp.ras = &hdp_v4_0_ras;
> >     amdgpu_ras_register_ras_block(adev, &adev->hdp.ras->ras_block);
> > +   adev->hdp.ras_if = &adev->hdp.ras->ras_block.ras_comm;
> >  }
> >
> >  static void gmc_v9_0_set_mca_funcs(struct amdgpu_device *adev) diff
> > --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/hdp_v4_0.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/hdp_v4_0.c
> > index 503c292b321e..a9ed4232cdeb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/hdp_v4_0.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/hdp_v4_0.c
> > @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ struct amdgpu_hdp_ras hdp_v4_0_ras = {
> >             .ras_comm = {
> >                     .name = "hdp",
> >                     .block = AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__HDP,
> > +                   .type =
> > AMDGPU_RAS_ERROR__MULTI_UNCORRECTABLE,
> >             },
> >             .hw_ops = &hdp_v4_0_ras_hw_ops,
> >             .ras_late_init = amdgpu_hdp_ras_late_init,
> > --
> > 2.25.1

Reply via email to