Às 15:22 de 20/07/22, Maíra Canal escreveu: > The functions dml30_CalculateWriteBackDISPCLK and > dml31_CalculateWriteBackDISPCLK are identical. Therefor, to avoid > code duplication, dml31_CalculateWriteBackDISPCLK is removed and > replaced by dml30_CalculateWriteBackDISPCLK. >
The message should be in imperative mood: "to avoid code duplication, dml31_CalculateWriteBackDISPCLK is removed and replaced by dml30_CalculateWriteBackDISPCLK." -> "to avoid code duplication, replace dml31_CalculateWriteBackDISPCLK by dml30_CalculateWriteBackDISPCLK" > Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <mairaca...@riseup.net> > ---
