Now that we've fixed the issue with using the incorrect topology manager,
we're actually grabbing the topology manager's lock - and consequently
deadlocking. Luckily for us though, there's actually nothing in AMD's DSC
state computation code that really should need this lock. The one exception
is the mutex_lock() in dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode(), however we grab no
locks beneath &mgr->lock there so that should be fine to leave be.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <ly...@redhat.com>
Gitlab issue: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2171
Fixes: 8c20a1ed9b4f ("drm/amd/display: MST DSC compute fair share")
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> # v5.6+
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
index 5196c9a0e432d..59648f5ffb59d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
@@ -1148,10 +1148,8 @@ int compute_mst_dsc_configs_for_state(struct 
drm_atomic_state *state,
                        continue;
 
                mst_mgr = aconnector->port->mgr;
-               mutex_lock(&mst_mgr->lock);
                ret = compute_mst_dsc_configs_for_link(state, dc_state, 
stream->link, vars, mst_mgr,
                                                       &link_vars_start_index);
-               mutex_unlock(&mst_mgr->lock);
                if (ret != 0)
                        return ret;
 
@@ -1208,10 +1206,8 @@ static int pre_compute_mst_dsc_configs_for_state(struct 
drm_atomic_state *state,
                        continue;
 
                mst_mgr = aconnector->port->mgr;
-               mutex_lock(&mst_mgr->lock);
                ret = compute_mst_dsc_configs_for_link(state, dc_state, 
stream->link, vars, mst_mgr,
                                                       &link_vars_start_index);
-               mutex_unlock(&mst_mgr->lock);
                if (ret != 0)
                        return ret;
 
-- 
2.37.3

Reply via email to