From: Xiaogang Chen <xiaogang.c...@amd.com> When xnack is on user space can use svm page restore to set a vm range without setup it first, then use regular api to register. Currently kfd api and svm are not interoperable. We already have check on that, but for user buffer the mapping address is not same as buffer cpu virtual address. Add checking on that to avoid error propagate to hmm. --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c index f79b8e964140..6d9cf860d2da 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c @@ -1065,6 +1065,21 @@ static int kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu(struct file *filep, mutex_unlock(&p->svms.lock); return -EADDRINUSE; } + + /* When register user buffer check if it has been registered by svm by + * buffer cpu virtual address. + */ + if ((flags & KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_USERPTR) && + interval_tree_iter_first(&p->svms.objects, + args->mmap_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT, + (args->mmap_offset + args->size - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT)) { + + pr_err("User Buffer Address: 0x%llx already allocated by SVM\n", + args->mmap_offset); + mutex_unlock(&p->svms.lock); + return -EADDRINUSE; + } + mutex_unlock(&p->svms.lock); #endif mutex_lock(&p->mutex); -- 2.25.1