On 2/21/23 07:25, Lazar, Lijo wrote:
On 2/21/2023 1:46 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
dGPUs that will be using BACO or BOCO shouldn't be put into S3
when the system is being put into s2idle.
Cc: Peter Kopec <peko...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limoncie...@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c
index 25e902077caf..5c69116bc883 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c
@@ -1038,8 +1038,13 @@ void amdgpu_acpi_detect(void)
*/
bool amdgpu_acpi_is_s3_active(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
{
- return !(adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU) ||
- (pm_suspend_target_state == PM_SUSPEND_MEM);
+ if (pm_suspend_target_state == PM_SUSPEND_MEM)
+ return true;
+ if (adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU)
+ return false;
What is the expected path of APUs which don't support S2idle?
They should staying powered on and not running any suspend code.
Since they don't support BACO or BOCO I expect the call to enter
autosuspend to be a no-op for them.
This was shown to improve power consumption for such cases (a reporter
actually measured it).
Thanks,
Lijo
+ return !amdgpu_device_supports_baco(&adev->ddev) &&
+ !amdgpu_device_supports_boco(&adev->ddev);
+
}
/**
