[Public]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Huang, JinHuiEric <jinhuieric.hu...@amd.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2023 5:23 PM
> To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Kim, Jonathan <jonathan....@amd.com>; Kim, Jonathan
> <jonathan....@amd.com>; Kuehling, Felix <felix.kuehl...@amd.com>;
> Huang, JinHuiEric <jinhuieric.hu...@amd.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 2/5] drm/amdkfd: add multi-process debugging support for
> GC v9.4.3
>
> From: Jonathan Kim <jonathan....@amd.com>
>
> Similar to GC v9.4.2, GC v9.4.3 should use the 5-Dword extended
> MAP_PROCESS packet to support multi-process debugging.  Update the
> mutli-process debug support list so that the KFD updates the runlist
> on debug mode setting and that it allocates enough GTT memory during
> KFD device initialization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Kim <jonathan....@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehl...@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Huang <jinhuieric.hu...@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_debug.h | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_debug.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_debug.h
> index a289e59ceb79..a0afc6a7b6c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_debug.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_debug.h
> @@ -76,8 +76,9 @@ int kfd_dbg_send_exception_to_runtime(struct
> kfd_process *p,
>
>  static inline bool kfd_dbg_is_per_vmid_supported(struct kfd_node *dev)
>  {
> -     return KFD_GC_VERSION(dev) == IP_VERSION(9, 4, 2) ||
> -            KFD_GC_VERSION(dev) >= IP_VERSION(11, 0, 0);
> +     return (KFD_GC_VERSION(dev) == IP_VERSION(9, 4, 2) ||
> +             KFD_GC_VERSION(dev) == IP_VERSION(9, 4, 3) ||
> +             KFD_GC_VERSION(dev) >= IP_VERSION(11, 0, 0));
>  }

This should probably be the last patch in the series since the rest of the 
series is required to enable debugging correctly.
Also did we ever close on enabling the trap temporaries regardless of debug 
mode?
IIRC, core dump will require this to capture consistent wave data.
That should probably be done in this patch since this check will also trigger 
the ttmp setup call on process creation.

Thanks,

Jon

>
>  void debug_event_write_work_handler(struct work_struct *work);
> --
> 2.34.1

Reply via email to