[Why]
There is no need to consider payload->delete case since we won't call
drm_dp_add_payload_part2() to create a payload when we're about to
remove it.

[How]
Delete unnecessary case to simplify the code.

Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <wayne....@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <ly...@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index ed96cfcfa304..4d80426757ab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -3411,12 +3411,8 @@ int drm_dp_add_payload_part2(struct 
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 
        ret = drm_dp_create_payload_step2(mgr, payload);
        if (ret < 0) {
-               if (!payload->delete)
-                       drm_err(mgr->dev, "Step 2 of creating MST payload for 
%p failed: %d\n",
-                               payload->port, ret);
-               else
-                       drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev, "Step 2 of removing MST payload 
for %p failed: %d\n",
-                                   payload->port, ret);
+               drm_err(mgr->dev, "Step 2 of creating MST payload for %p 
failed: %d\n",
+                       payload->port, ret);
        }
 
        return ret;
-- 
2.37.3

Reply via email to