On 10/31/23 15:34, Christian König wrote:
> Am 31.10.23 um 15:14 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> 
>> FWIW, RADV will also want explicit sync in the CS ioctl.
> You can replace that with the DMA-buf IOCTLs like Faith is planning to do for 
> NVK. 

Those ioctls cannot disable implicit sync for the CS ioctl. They can be used 
for making implicit sync work correctly for individual BOs though, once 
implicit sync is disabled for the CS ioctl.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer            |                  https://redhat.com
Libre software enthusiast          |         Mesa and Xwayland developer

Reply via email to