Hi!

> > > From: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
> > > 
> > > [ Upstream commit 49afe91370b86566857a3c2c39612cf098110885 ]
> > > 
> > > For pptable structs that use flexible array sizes, use flexible arrays.
> > > 
> > > Link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2039926
> > > Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limoncie...@amd.com>
> > > Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
> > 
> > I don't think any of these UBSAN flexible array changes are stable material.
> 
> I'll drop it, but in general we've been taking kasan/ubsan/kcsan/...
> annotation fixes since it enables (easier) testing on the LTS trees, and
> for example finding issues specific to those LTS trees.

I believe they should not be in stable, either.

In any case, Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst should be
updated, because it contradicts current practice.

Best regards,
                                                                Pavel
-- 
People of Russia, stop Putin before his war on Ukraine escalates.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to