On 11 Oct 2010, at 11:19 , Ivo Ladage-van Doorn wrote: > Comments I have concerning remarks below: > "Pax Web should probably either be dumped completely or fixed. It has serious > issues. Alternative: Felix Http Server (yes that does not support non-spec > extensions but we should not rely on those anyway)."
> I agree, however at the moment we still need JSP support (filter support was > needed before but not anymore since we replaced JSecurity by UserAdmin). I don't agree we need JSP support at runtime, as we do not have any means of dynamically deploying JSP files. Futhermore, there are "separate" JSP compilers if we really do (that transform *.jsp resources to Servlets which can again be deployed to HttpService) in case we do need it. Or we make sure that Pax Web gets fixed, but even then we should not rely on non-standard features. Again, I'm not saying we must fix this right now, but we should address it in the future. Greetings, Marcel
