You didn't, but standard Sun conventions say 80. I assumed Ace conventions referred to those, but only for Javadoc I see.
From: amdatu-developers-bounces at amdatu.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcel Offermans Sent: maandag 11 oktober 2010 11:50 To: amdatu-developers at amdatu.org Subject: Re: [Amdatu-developers] code style / formatting? I don't think it mentioned a line length of 80 anywhere, but I've added one (120) now. There is some debate about line lengths in general though as printing code might yield very small fonts if printed with 120 characters to A4. Anyway, killing trees is evil anyway, so let's go with 120! Greetings, Marcel On 11 Oct 2010, at 11:33 , Ivo Ladage-van Doorn wrote: Although it is indeed not (yet) documented on the WIKI, the conventions used until now are the ones used internally by GX. Not by coincidence they match almost perfectly (from what I can see after scanning it for a few seconds) with the conventions Marcel proposed. Only differences I see for now are the new lines in try/catch and if/else. Personally I prefer the conventions as in the Apache ace conventions. So my suggestion: http://incubator.apache.org/ace/java-coding-style-guide.html rulez! But also agree with Bram; should add line length 120. Line length 80 is just not of this time anymore... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.amdatu.org/pipermail/amdatu-developers/attachments/20101011/4ef79430/attachment.html
