On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Marcel Offermans <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 28, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Bram de Kruijff wrote: > >> got this question from a colleague who noticed the configuration >> property "org.osgi.service.http.hostname" is in our web configuration >> but it does not seem to do anything. Question is whether it is really >> a dummy or not :s >> >> 0) The OSGi Compendium spec 4.2 does not specify this option (see the sepc) >> 1) The Felix HTTP Service does not specify this property (see [1]) >> 2) The Knopflerfish HttpService DOES specify this property (see[2]) >> >> KF says "Host (IP interface name) to open the HTTP server socket on. >> An empty string means all available interfaces" which may actually >> make sense. Anyone ran into this before and/or tried to bind to a >> specific interface? > > Looking at this from another angle: it's non-standard, we're not sure if > anybody is using it right now, so let's just remove it. > > Btw, I can see the value of just binding to a specific interface, but if > someone needs this, and is fine with using an implementation specific > extension, then let him/her add this property in *their* configuration. We > should not do so in *our* configuration.
Ok, agreed and thus removed at http://jira.amdatu.org/jira/browse/AMDATU-429 grz Bram > Greetings, Marcel > > > _______________________________________________ > Amdatu-developers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.amdatu.org/mailman/listinfo/amdatu-developers > _______________________________________________ Amdatu-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.amdatu.org/mailman/listinfo/amdatu-developers
