[
http://jira.amdatu.org/jira/browse/AMDATU-592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12900#comment-12900
]
Jan Willem Janssen commented on AMDATU-592:
-------------------------------------------
I've updated the confluence page with my remarks.
Summary: I agree with marrs on the use of a BSN prefix for multitenant-aware
bundles instead of a suffix/classifier. As for the lifecycle, both variants of
a bundles are so related that they should have the same lifecycle, IMO.
@Bram: do you have additional comments on this?
> Change multi-tenant artifact naming scheme
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMDATU-592
> URL: http://jira.amdatu.org/jira/browse/AMDATU-592
> Project: Amdatu
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Bram de Kruijff
> Assignee: Jan Willem Janssen
> Fix For: Sprint 9
>
>
> As documented under [0] we need a clear convention on namespace/location of
> both owned and 3rd party wrapped artifacts.
> Document proposed convention and adjust existing build to it.
> Also change purge core namespace while we are at it?
> [0]
> http://www.amdatu.org/confluence/display/Amdatu/AMDATU-567+multitenant+bundles
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
http://jira.amdatu.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
Amdatu-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.amdatu.org/mailman/listinfo/amdatu-developers
