![]() |
|
|
|
|
Issue Type:
|
![Task]() Task
|
|
Affects Versions:
|
0.4.0 |
|
Assignee:
|
Unassigned |
|
Components:
|
Wiki Documentation |
|
Created:
|
02/May/12 10:09 AM
|
|
Description:
|
Some examples:
- Service Fabric is mentioned in many pages (i.e. Amdatu Platform, Amdatu Platform/Architecture/Application Architecture, Amdatu Platform/Architecture/Principe Mechanisms/Service Fabric and Amdatu Platform/Modules/Amdatu Fabric) but doesn't really exist (no source, no release). If it is a component in design, it should not be mixed with documentation describing the existing platform components.
- Brainstorm/design pages and documentation of existing components are mixed. Service Fabric is often mentioned as existing component for example.
- Documentation of various versions are mixed. For example, documentation of Modules/Amdatu Core/JRE SPI integration is valid for 0.2.1 but not for 0.4.0. The page above, Amdatu Core Bundles, is not valid for 0.2.1 but is for 0.4.0.
- Modules/Amdatu Core is outdated (still mentions config-templates)
- Modules/Amdatu Core/JRE SPI integration is outdated; mentioned artifact does not exist (at least, not in 0.4.0).
- Project information/Issue Tracking seems broken. I would expect the JIRA URLs to be mentioned here.
- Project information/Continuous Integration seems broken. I would expect to see Bamboo URLs here.
- Documentation/Developers/Quick Start guide states that you should download the 0.0.1-SNAPSHOT release. Page should be rewritten
- Documentation/Developers/Getting started is outdated. Page should be rewritten
- Documentation/Developers/API documentation is outdated. Page should be rewritten
- 'Contributers' should be 'Contributors'
- Documentation/Contributers/Integration tests needs to be updated
- Downloads page is outdated/obsolete
- Attic and Sandbox pages should be moved to their own space. Pages in the Attic will appear in search results and thus be viewed by developers, but they are obsolete and/or outdated and should thus not be visible to developers.
- I miss an overview of the actual contents or 'definition' of the platform. Various components that I consider to be part of the platform have its own lifecycle and/or are released independently from each other. So I am totally lost about what components are part of the platform and what the status is of components that are not part of the platform. If a vote goes out for 'platform 0.4.0', what are we voting about?
Examples of components with a fuzzy status:
0 kitchensink has its own lifecycle ![]()
0 Amdatu parent pom has its own lifecycle and seems to be released independent from any existing projects (6-RC2 is latest version)
0 AMS is stated as an official subproject, but as far as I know it is not
0 etc/checkstyle has its own lifecycle (2 is latest version) and seems to be released independent from any existing projects
|
|
Project:
|
Amdatu
|
|
Labels:
|
pfu040
|
|
Priority:
|
![Major]() Major
|
|
Reporter:
|
Ivo Ladage - van Doorn
|
|
|
|
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
|
_______________________________________________
Amdatu-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.amdatu.org/mailman/listinfo/amdatu-developers
