Hello Jan, congrats for grinding through the obstacles of getting hardware to run!
On 05/07/2012 07:59 PM, Jan Kromhout wrote: > A few hours ago I first really started amforth > What strikes me is that I can enter two identical words without an error. I would not see this as a bug. The behaviour of Forth is deterministic: it will execute the first word in the vocabulary with that name, that is the last you defined with that name. With this feature, you can incrementally expand your definitions: > : word1 do-this ; > : word1 word1 do-that ; which is equivalent of course of > : word1 do-this do-that ; I use this sometimes when interactively building up talking to hardware. > This is not the case in other forth versions that I have used. > Is this a conscious choice or a bug? I'm not a standards boy, so I wouldn't know, if this is considered a bug. Cheers, Erich ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/ Amforth-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel
